PA · rules
Delaware Cnty. C.P. DistrictCourtAdminOrders_AOD THIS 3
DAY OF A
adoB
ANGELA L MARTINEZ, ESQ., DIRECTOR
OFFICE OF JUDICIAL SUPPORT
CC: Magisterial District Judges
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF WARE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
IN RE: TEMPORARY ASSIGNMENT OF
ISSUING AUTHORITY
CHANGE OF VENUE AND
LOCATION OF PROCEEDINGS
MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET
NUMBER: 12-5040
WHEREAS, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has delegated to the President Judge
Court of Common Pleas of each Judicial District in the general supervision and administrative control
of Magisterial District Judges within his Judicial District as set forth in Rule 17 of the Rules
Governing Standards of Conduct of Magisterial District Judges; and,
WHEREAS, Rule 112 of the Rules and Standards with respect to the offices of Magisterial
District Judges provides that the President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of a Judicial District
may assign temporarily the Magisterial District Judge of any Magisterial District to any other
Magisterial District whenever such an assignment is required for the efficient administration of
justice; and,
WHEREAS, Rules 21, 22, 23, 24 and 25 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure provide for the
venue, location of proceedings before issuing authority, availability, temporary assignment and
powers of the issuing authority the assignment and changes of venue of the issuing authority by the
President Judge of the Judicial District;TH
NOW THEREFORE, this 4 day of December 2012, it is hereby ORDERED and
DECREED, that Charles E. McDonald, Esquire, Administrator for Magisterial District Judges, is
hereby delegated the authority to hold hearings and receive testimony on changes of venue, location
and the assignment of Magisterial District Judges for and/or on behalf of the President Judge of the
Thirty-Second Judicial District to ensure fair and impartial proceeding as well as the efficient
administration of justice in accordance with the following procedures;
1.In all cases in which the Magisterial District Judge shall recuse him or herself for whatever
reason, the Administrator shall, in writing, make a recommendation to the President Judge to
whom the case shall be assigned. Upon the execution of an Order by the President Judge
transferring the case, the Administrator shall notify the Magisterial District Judge recusing
him or herself advising to whom the case has been assigned. It shall be the responsibility of
the Magisterial District Judge recusing him or herself to notify all parties of the change in
assignment and to transfer the case to the Magisterial District Judge who has been assigned to
hear the matter.
2.In all other cases in which one or more parties request a change of venue on the grounds of
bias, conflict of interest, inconvenience, or for any other reason whatsoever, the Administrator
shall:
Require the party requesting a change of venue to submit a petition, in writing, on a form
which shall be prescribed by the Administrator.
The petition shall be signed by the party or parties and be verified.
Upon the filing of the petition with the administrator, all proceedings shall be stayed
pending a decision on the request for a change of venue.
Unless waived by the parties, the Administrator shall hold a hearing within forty-five (45)
days from the date the petition is filed with the Administrator, and said hearing shall be at
a location set by the Administrator.
All parties in the matter shall be notified in writing by regular mail, at least five (5) days
prior to the hearing, setting forth the date, time and place of the hearing.
A.Require the party requesting a change of venue to submit a petition, in writing, on a form
which shall be prescribed by the Administrator.
B.The petition shall be signed by the party or parties and be verified.
C.Upon the filing of the petition with the administrator, all proceedings shall be stayed
pending a decision on the request for a change of venue.
D.Unless waived by the parties, the Administrator shall hold a hearing within forty-five (45)
days from the date the petition is filed with the Administrator, and said hearing shall be at
a location set by the Administrator.
E.All parties in the matter shall be notified in writing by regular mail, at least five (5) days
prior to the hearing, setting forth the date, time and place of the hearing.
F.Whenever a party fails to appear for the hearing and the request for change of venue, he
or she shall be deemed to have consented to the hearing in his or her absence.
G.The Administrator shall take testimony and make a recommendation to the President
Judge regarding the change of venue.
H.Upon the execution of an order regarding the change of venue by the President Judge, a
copy of the order shall be mailed, by regular mail to all parties.
I.In all cases, where a change of venue has been granted, a new Magisterial District Judge
has been assigned, it shall be the responsibility of the Magisterial District Judge, wherein
the case was filed, to notify all parties of the change in assignment and to transfer the case
to the Magisterial District Judge who has been assigned the matter by the President Judge.
CAB
BY THE COURT;
IN RE: Implementing Procedures for
Magisterial District Judges
12-002
: NUMBER: 12-5040
PRESIDENT JUDGE ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER
AND NOW, this 28th day of August 2012, it is hereby ORDERED and
DECREED that all cases in which a defendant is Waiving a Preliminary Hearing, the
Waiver shall be placed on the Record.
BY THE COURT:
CHAD IFL KENNEY
CC: Magisterial District Judges
25 2:25
19 SUPPLIER SUPPPM CO.
Provenance
- Source
- www.delcopa.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
c84fe1daee8426c1446309e3e024531ed2f1288de6c933b181f699aba2225826
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.