PA · rules
Chester Cnty. C.P. Court of Common Pleas Civil Rules Rule 225.1
Jury Trial Summation
(a) Unless the trial judge shall otherwise grant leave, only one attorney may sum up for any party.
(b) In trials which involve only one plaintiff and one defendant, if evidence has been received from each party, plaintiff’s attorney
shall first sum up and defendant’s attorney shall then follow. Plaintiff’s attorney may then speak solely in rebuttal. If no evidence
has been received from the defendant, the same order of summation shall apply, except that plaintiff’s attorney shall not speak
in rebuttal.
(c) In trials which involve a third-party action, if evidence has been received from each party, the plaintiff’s attorney shall first sum
up as in (b). Defendant’s attorney shall next sum up both for defendant, as in (b), and for defendant as third-party plaintiff. The
attorney for the third party (i.e., additional) defendant shall next sum up as the nature of his third-party defense may require.
The attorney for third-party plaintiff may then reply in rebuttal and thereafter the attorney for the original plaintiff may reply
in rebuttal of only the arguments made by the original defendant.
(d) In multi-party actions and in actions which involve third-party actions, if one or more of the parties offers no evidence, the order
of summation shall be determined by the trial judge.
(e) In actions involving more than one plaintiff, defendant or third-party defendant, the trial judge shall determine the order of
speaking.
Provenance
- Source
- www.chesco.org
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
fdccec5fae05d3e15c3a9df097f74ababf8e86e049fb9103442871845d06f13a
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.