PA · rules
Butler Cnty. C.P. L1920.51a Masters Proceedings
Butler County local rules: L1920.51a Masters Proceedings
L1920.51(a) Masters Proceedings (This rule amended June 25, 2012)
(1) The court may appoint a master to receive evidence, make findings of fact, and
recommend to the court a disposition of all issues referred to the master. Masters may be
appointed, in the court’s discretion, in cases of divorce, equitable distribution, alimony, claims
for counsel fees, expert fees, other litigation expenses, special relief for exclusive possession,
and in any other type of matter authorized by law or rule of court. The issues to be determined
by the master will be framed by the court’s pre-trial order; accordingly, except with leave of
court, there will not be a pre-trial conference before the master.
(2) The court may appoint as a master any attorney licensed to practice law in the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, having 10 years experience as a lawyer, including significant
trial experience, or who has 10 years combined experience as a lawyer with trial experience and
as a judge, district justice, master or as a comparable judicial officer, and who possesses, in the
court’s opinion, appropriate knowledge of the legal subjects at issue, and an appropriate
judicial temperament. A master appointed by the Court pursuant to this rule is not precluded
from practicing family law in Butler County.
(3) Masters shall be compensated by the parties to the litigation based on a fee schedule
published by the court from time to time by general administrative order. If, pursuant to
Pa..R.C.P. No. 1920.51(a) (3), a party moves for appointment of a master, the moving party shall
deposit a sum with the prothonotary to cover the master’s initial fee. The amount of deposit
shall be set from time to time by general administrative order. Pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. No.
1920.51(a)(2)(I), the master may direct the parties to deposit further amounts with the
Prothonotary. A Special Divorce Master appointed by the Court shall receive a minimum fee of
$600, unless all matters referred to the Master are settled by written agreement of the parties
filed within 10 days of the date the Order appointing the Master is docketed.
(4) A party filing a motion to compel discovery, a motion for sanctions, a motion to limit
discovery or for a protective order, a motion in limine, or a motion to stay the master’s hearing
must address such application to the court. Other applications, by mutual consent, may be
presented to the master; however, absent mutual consent all other applications shall be
presented to the court.
(5) Once a master is appointed, any document subsequently filed with the court shall be
served upon the master by the filing party. In addition, the prothonotary shall serve the master
with copies of any orders issued.1
Comment: Cases are referred to the Master because it is assumed they will not settle, and
because the Court deems them ready for trial. Masters promptly review the file, schedule
hearings, note concerns with the adequacy of the pretrial statements, discuss stipulations and
deal with other issues. Cases often settle after these preliminary steps are taken. The rule
“Any document” is an all-inclusive term.
recognizes the value of such contributions to the process of resolving cases, even if the parties
do not. Masters should wait 10 days after appointment to expend significant time on the file, to
allow for a quick settlement, for less than the “minimum” fee.
Provenance
- Source
- www.butlercountypa.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
6a7a214864fd35ae599391d5a413acf2e8b09d4ce60fc1c8607caf5c7f965324
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.