Bindinglaw

PA · rules

Bucks Cnty. C.P. Rule 1920.53 (e)

Bucks County local rules: Rule 1920.53 (e)

activein force · 2026-09-30 – presentact-effective-date

Rule 1920.53*(e) Uncontested Hearings Using Prepared Record of Testimony

In cases using the plaintiff's record of testimony the master's hearing shall be

conducted as follows:

(1) The plaintiff and the witnesses shall swear to or affirm their pre-recorded

evidence in the presence of the master;

(2) The master shall examine the plaintiff and the witnesses with respect to the

evidence prepared in advance in order to evaluate the credibility of those offering

pre-recorded evidence, and, to this end, may interrogate the plaintiff and the

witnesses as to any relevant matters, whether or not included in the prepared record

of testimony;

(3) The master, upon being satisfied that the Prepared Record of Testimony is

based on credible evidence, shall accept it and include it in his report in lieu of

Findings on the Merits, provided, however, that in the report the master certifies:

(a) that at the hearing in his presence the plaintiff and the witnesses offering pre-recorded evidence were placed under oath or affirmation and were examined by

him and that they, by credible evidence substantiated the facts set forth in the

Prepared Record of Testimony, and

(b) that no witness who was sworn or affirmed presented testimony or evidence to

the contrary of facts set forth in the Prepared Record of Testimony.

Provenance

Source
www.buckscounty.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-30
Edition
2026-09-30
Content hash
4242aac4314f2d8c6b991655b864d50b5773ac2b96c031031f7784c7ad7afa00
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.