PA · rules
Blair Cnty. C.P. Case Record Public Access § 5
0 Responding to Requests for Access to Case Records
A. A custodian shall fulfill a request for access to case records as promptly as
possible under the circumstances existing at the time of the request.
B. If a custodian cannot fulfill the request promptly or at all, the custodian
shall inform the requestor of the specific reason(s) why access to the
information is being delayed or denied.
C. If a custodian denies a written request for access, the denial shall be in
writing.
D. Except as provided in Subsection E, [R]relief from a custodian's
written denial may be sought by filing a motion or application with the
court for which the custodian maintains the records.
E. Relief from a magisterial district court may be sought by filing an
appeal with the president judge of the judicial district or the president
judge’s designee. Relief from a written denial by the Philadelphia
Municipal Court may be sought by filing a motion with the president
judge of Philadelphia Municipal Court or the president judge’s
designee.
Given that most public access requests for case records are straightforward and
usually involve a particular case or matter, custodians should process the same in an
expeditious fashion.
There are a number of factors that can affect how quickly a custodian may
respond to a request. For example, the custodian’s response may be slowed if the request
is vague, involves retrieval of a large number of case records, or involves information
that is stored off-site. Ultimately, the goal is to respond timely to requests for case
records.
In those unusual instances in which access to the case records cannot be granted
in an expeditious fashion, the custodian shall inform the requestor of the specific
reason(s) why access to the information is being delayed or denied, which may include:
the request involves such voluminous amounts of information that the
custodian is unable to fulfill the same without substantially impeding the
orderly conduct of the court or custodian’s office;
records in closed cases are located at an off-site facility;
a particular file is in use by a judge or court staff. If a judge or court staff
needs the file for an extended period of time, special procedures should be
considered, such as making a duplicate file that is always available for
public inspection;
the requestor failed to pay the appropriate fees, as established pursuant to
Provenance
- Source
- www.blaircountypa.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
aa2624b64eb5da9431b01256b824b9c280e374879ec1b1177752648d8537c23f
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.