PA · rules
Pa. Disciplinary Bd. R. 95.3
Monitoring of notices to be sent by formerly admitted attorneys
•
It is the practice of the Executive Office to monitor the filing by formerly admitted attorneys of the verified statement of compliance required under § 91.96 (relating to proof of compliance) and, if the statement is not filed within the prescribed period, the Executive Office will mail to the formerly admitted attorney a reminder of the obligation under § 91.96 to file the statement. Failure by the Executive Office to mail the reminder, or failure by the formerly admitted attorney to receive the reminder, shall not relieve the formerly admitted attorney of the obligation to file the verified statement of compliance. As required by § 91.99 (relating to maintenance of records), the Executive Office will not accept for filing a petition for reinstatement until the formerly admitted attorney has filed the verified statement of compliance or obtained a waiver from the Board of the requirement to file the statement. As required by Enforcement Rule 217(e)(3) and subsections (a) and (b) of § 89.272 (relating to waiting period), if an order of disbarment or suspension for a period exceeding one year is entered on or after February 28, 2015, the waiting period for eligibility to apply for reinstatement to the practice of law shall not begin until the formerly admitted attorney who is the subject of that order files the verified statement of compliance required by § 91.96.
Provenance
- Source
- www.padisciplinaryboard.org
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
a43856d29f94ad275fd397cbd74639d8c4b386b3df5d17ddad4223eddfed446e
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.