PA · rules
Pa. Disciplinary Bd. R. 89.72
Subjects which may be considered at conferences to expedite hearings
•
At the prehearing conference required by § 89.57 (relating to scheduling of hearing and prehearing conference and any other conferences which may be held to expedite the orderly conduct and disposition of any hearing, there may be considered, in addition to any offers of settlement permitted under § 89.71 (relating to conferences to expedite proceedings) and any applications for protective orders under § 93.104 (relating to protective orders), the possibility of the following:
•
The simplification of the issues.
•
The exchange and acceptance of service of exhibits proposed to be offered in evidence.
•
The obtaining of admissions as to, or stipulations of, facts not remaining in dispute, or the authenticity of documents which might properly shorten the hearing.
•
The limitation of the number of witnesses and the identification of expert witnesses. The member of a hearing committee presiding at a conference may order the parties to exchange the names and addresses of all expert witnesses and to provide the opposing party with copies of all expert reports. The order may provide that failure to comply with it shall have the consequences described in § 89.93(c) (relating to exclusion of evidence).
•
The discovery or production of data.
•
Such other matters as may properly be dealt with to aid in expediting the orderly conduct and disposition of the proceeding.
Provenance
- Source
- www.padisciplinaryboard.org
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
da4398dbffd58313ab2ff3f7a5fef9fbac0bca8ac532e2a6686ca85e645a7e03
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.