PA · rules
Pa. Disciplinary Bd. R. 89.274
Notice of reinstatement proceedings
•
General rule. The Executive Office shall forward a copy of the petition for reinstatement and Form DB-30 (Reference for Reinstatement Hearing) to:
•
The Office of Disciplinary Counsel;
•
The president judge of the court of common pleas of the judicial district in which the formerly admitted attorney practiced;
•
The chief judge of the United States district court for the district in which such attorney practiced;
•
The executive director of the bar association of the county in which such attorney practiced;
•
The Executive Director of the Pennsylvania Bar Association; and
•
The Executive Director of the Lawyers Fund for Client Security.
•
Publication of notice. The Executive Office shall cause a notice to be published in the legal journal and a newspaper of general circulation in the county in which the formerly admitted attorney practiced and in each county in Pennsylvania in which the formerly admitted attorney has resided since being disbarred or suspended for disciplinary reasons. The notice shall state and be confined to:
•
The name of such formerly admitted attorney.
•
That on or after a specified date (to be set forth in the notice) a hearing committee of the Board will consider a petition for reinstatement filed by such person.
•
The address of the district office of the Office of Disciplinary Counsel that is handling the reinstatement proceeding.
Provenance
- Source
- www.padisciplinaryboard.org
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
753676a7a26324e6ae7066a913e8183110389b98790a77ebc344ebfbac32ea32
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.