Bindinglaw

PA · rules

Pa. Code of Judicial Conduct Rule 1.3

Avoiding Abuse of the Prestige of Judicial Office

activein force · 2020-01-20 – presentact-effective-date

A judge shall not abuse the prestige of judicial office to advance the personal or economic interests of the judge or others, or allow others to do so.

Comment:

(1) It is improper for a judge to use or attempt to use his or her position to gain personal advantage or preferential treatment of any kind. For example, it would be improper for a judge to allude to his or her judicial status to gain favorable treatment in encounters with traffic officials. Similarly, a judge must not use judicial letterhead to gain an advantage in conducting his or her personal business. A judge should also not lend the prestige of his or her office to advance the private interests of others, nor convey or knowingly permit others to convey the impression that they are in a special position to influence the judge.

(2) A judge may provide a reference or recommendation for an individual based upon the judge’s personal knowledge. The judge may use official letterhead if the judge indicates that the reference is personal and if there is no likelihood that the use of the letterhead would reasonably be perceived as an attempt to exert pressure by reason of the judicial office.

(3) Judges may participate in the process of judicial selection by cooperating with appointing authorities and screening committees, and by responding to inquiries from such entities concerning the professional qualifications of a person being considered for judicial office.

(4) Special considerations arise when judges write or contribute to publications of for-profit entities, whether related or unrelated to the law. A judge should not permit anyone associated with the publication of such materials to exploit the judge’s office in a manner that violates this Rule or other applicable law. In contracts for publication of a judge’s writing, the judge should retain sufficient control over the advertising and promotion of such writing to avoid such exploitation.

Canon 2. A judge shall perform the duties of judicial office impartially, competently, and diligently.

Rule

2.1. Giving Precedence to the Duties of Judicial Office.

2.2. Impartiality and Fairness.

2.3. Bias, Prejudice, and Harassment.

2.4. External Influences on Judicial Conduct.

2.5. Competence, Diligence and Cooperation.

2.6. Ensuring the Right to Be Heard.

2.7. Responsibility to Decide.

2.8. Decorum, Demeanor, and Communication with Jurors.

2.9. Ex parte Communications.

2.10. Judicial Statements on Pending and Impending Cases.

2.11. Disqualification.

2.12. Supervisory Duties.

2.13. Administrative Appointments.

2.14. Disability and Impairment.

2.15. Responding to Judicial and Lawyer Misconduct.

2.16. Cooperation with Disciplinary Authorities.

Provenance

Source
judicialconductboardofpa.org
Retrieved
2026-09-30
Edition
2026-09-30
Content hash
d1b815c6f8fbb6c0ddcc0d838fe1c47a0f7e5fddb7dfd446781f2719de5cc934
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.