Bindinglaw

OR · rules

UTCR 3.180

ELECTRONIC RECORDING AND WRITING

activein force · 2026-08-01 – presentact-effective-date

(1) As used in this rule:

(a) “Electronic Recording” includes video recording, audio recording, and still

photography by cell phone, tablet, computer, camera, tape recorder, or any

other means. “Electronic recording” does not include “electronic writing.”

(b) “Electronic Writing” means the taking of notes or otherwise writing by

electronic means and includes but is not limited to the use of word processing

software and the composition of texts, emails, and instant messages.

(c) “Electronic Transmission” means to send an electronic recording or writing,

including but not limited to transmission by email, text, or instant message;

live streaming; or posting to a social media or networking service.

(2) Except with the express prior permission of the court, and except as provided in

subsection (3) of this rule, a person may not:

(a) Electronically record in any area of the courthouse under the control and

supervision of the court unless permitted by Supplementary Local Rule (SLR)

pursuant to subsection (11)(a) of this rule;

(b) Electronically record any court proceeding;

(c) Electronically transmit any recording from within a courtroom during a

proceeding;

(d) Engage in electronic writing within a courtroom;

(e) Electronically transmit any electronic writing from within a courtroom during a

proceeding; or

(f) While remotely observing or participating in a proceeding, electronically

transmit any electronic writing directly and specifically to a witness until the

witness is excused by the court.

(3) Subsections (2)(d), (e), and (f) of this rule do not apply to attorneys or to agents of

attorneys unless otherwise ordered by the court.

(4) (a) A request for permission to engage in electronic recording or writing must be

made prior to the start of a proceeding. No fee may be charged.

(b) The granting of permission to any person or entity to engage in electronic

recording or writing is subject to the court’s discretion, which may include

considerations of the need to preserve the solemnity, decorum, or dignity of

the court; the protection of the parties, witnesses, or jurors; or whether the

requestor has demonstrated an understanding of all provisions of this rule.

(c) If the court grants all or part of the request,

(i) The court shall provide notice to all parties, and electronic recording or

writing thereafter shall be allowed in the proceeding, in any courtroom or

during a remote proceeding, consistent with the court’s permission.

(ii) The court shall permit one video camera, one still camera, and one

audio recorder in the courtroom, and it may permit additional cameras

and electronic recording in any courtroom or during a remote proceeding

consistent with this rule.

(iii) The court may prescribe the location of and the manner of operating

electronic equipment within a courtroom. Artificial lighting is not

permitted.

(iv) Any pooling arrangement made necessary by limitations on equipment

or personnel imposed by the court is the sole responsibility of the

persons or entities seeking to electronically record.

(v) The court will not mediate disputes. If multiple persons or entities

seeking to electronically record are unable to agree on the manner in

which the recording will be conducted or distributed, the court may

terminate any or all such recording.

(5) Except as otherwise provided in this rule:

(a) The court shall not wholly prohibit all electronic recording of a court

proceeding unless the court makes findings of fact on the record setting forth

substantial reasons that establish:

(i) A reasonable likelihood that the electronic recording will interfere with

the rights of the parties to a fair trial or will affect the presentation of

evidence or the outcome of the trial; or

(ii) A reasonable likelihood that the costs or other burdens imposed by the

electronic recording will interfere with the efficient administration of

justice.

(b) “Wholly prohibit all electronic recording” means issuing an order prohibiting all

recording of a proceeding by all persons. The court’s denial of a particular

request under the factors in section (4)(b) does not constitute an order

prohibiting all recording by all persons and does not require findings of fact on

the record, even if the person whose request is denied is the only person who

has requested permission to record a proceeding.

(6) The court has discretion to limit electronic recording of particular components of

the proceeding based on one or more of the following factors:

(a) The limitation is necessary to preserve the solemnity, decorum, or dignity of

the court or to protect the parties, witnesses, or jurors;

(b) The use of electronic recording equipment interferes with the proceedings;

(c) The electronic recording of a particular witness would endanger the welfare of

the witness or materially hamper the testimony of the witness; or

(d) The requestor has not demonstrated an understanding of all provisions of this

rule.

(7) Notwithstanding any other provision of this rule, the following may not be

electronically recorded by any person at any time:

(a) Proceedings in chambers.

(b) Any notes or conversations intended to be private including but not limited to

attorneys and judges conferring at the bench and conferences involving

attorneys and their clients.

(c) Dissolution, juvenile, paternity, adoption, custody, visitation, support, civil

commitment, trade secrets, and abuse, restraining, and stalking order

proceedings.

(d) Proceedings involving a sex crime, if the victim has requested that the

proceeding not be electronically recorded.

(e) Voir dire.

(f) Any juror anywhere under the control and supervision of the court during the

entire course of the trial in which the juror sits.

(g) Recesses or any other time the court is off the record.

(8) For the purpose of determining whether this rule or other requirements imposed by

the court have been violated, or to ensure the effective administration of justice, a

person engaged in electronic recording under this rule must, upon request and

without expense to the court, provide to the court, for in camera review, an

electronic recording in a format accessible to the court. The copy may be retained

by the court and may be sealed if necessary for the further administration of

justice.

(9) If a person violates this rule or any other requirement imposed by the court, the

court may order the person, and any organization with which the person is

affiliated, to terminate electronic recording or electronic writing.

(10) This rule does not:

(a) Limit the court’s contempt powers;

(b) Operate to waive ORS 44.510 to 44.540 (media shield law); or

(c) Apply to court personnel engaged in the performance of official duties.

(11) A judicial district may, by SLR:

(a) Designate areas outside a courtroom and under the control and supervision

of the court, including hallways or entrances, where electronic recording is

allowed without prior permission, unless otherwise ordered in a particular

instance.

(b) Adopt procedures to obtain permission for electronic recording or electronic

writing.

(c) SLR 3.181 is reserved for any SLR adopted under this subsection.

Provenance

Source
courts.oregon.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
9a75e6c0e300b4a268bbaba8338d80b1879b7a17a645e2e08febe55ec675536f
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.