OR · rules
UTCR 23.020
ASSIGNMENT OF CASES TO THE OCLC
(1) Assignment of a case to the OCLC requires agreement of the parties, the presiding
judge or designee of the court with venue, and the managing panel of the OCLC.
(2) The following must occur for a case to be considered for assignment to the OCLC:
(a) The parties and the presiding judge or designee of the court with venue must
confer to determine whether there is agreement to assign the case to the
OCLC and to determine the special needs, facts, and issues of the case.
(b) The presiding judge or designee of the court with venue and the managing
panel of the OCLC must confer to discuss whether the case is appropriate for
assignment to the OCLC and to discuss the special needs, facts, and issues
of the case.
(3) If the agreement required by UTCR 23.020(1) is reached and the managing panel
accepts a case into the OCLC, the parties must submit a stipulated order for
assignment of the case to the OCLC to the presiding judge or designee of the
court with venue over the case and to the managing panel of the OCLC.
(4) Once a case is accepted into the OCLC, the managing panel of the OCLC will
assign the case to a single OCLC judge.
(5) After assignment of the case to the OCLC judge, the parties must:
(a) File all documents in the court with venue; and
(b) If directed by the OCLC judge, provide copies of all filed documents to that
judge in the manner that the judge directs.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.oregon.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
fb36c8e72b329ebeffa702aa06bd4a77c4b296cece9aa45ae11544d7e97b3263
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.