OR · rules
UTCR 19.050
EXCEPTIONS TO AND LIMITATIONS ON APPLICABLE ORCP IN REMEDIAL PROCEEDINGS
Notwithstanding UTCR 19.040, in contempt proceedings for remedial sanctions:
(1) Unless the court determines that other claims should be joined for fair resolution of
the contempt matter, only the following claims may be joined with a contempt
claim:
(a) Claims that arise out of the order or judgment that the contemnor allegedly
violated;
(b) Claims that involve facts and issues that would necessarily be determined in
the contempt proceeding; and
(c) Other claims for contempt arising out of a related matter.
(2) ORCP references to “complaint” include the initiating instrument in a contempt
proceeding.
(3) ORCP applicable to juries and jury trials apply only when a statute or constitution
provides a specific right to jury trial in a contempt proceeding and a party claims
that right.
(4) A party may amend a pleading only on motion and with the court’s approval.
(5) The following ORCP do not apply: 3, 5, 21 C, 21 D, 21 E, 23 A, 24 A, 24 B, 25 A,
32, 54 A(1), 54 E, 66, 73, 81 A, 81 C, 82 A(3), 84, and 85.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.oregon.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
8dcbf4ca07781df11b06decafb0aae0b0178e4638ebf4971bd941212fa9b8f66
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.