OR · rules
UTCR 19.040
APPLICABILITY OF ORCP AND OTHER UTCR
(1) To the extent rules in this chapter are inconsistent with other applicable rules, the
rules in this chapter govern contempt proceedings under ORS 33.015 to 33.155.
Except as otherwise provided in this chapter:
(a) Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure (ORCP) and Oregon Rules of Appellate
Procedure (ORAP) apply respectively to original and appellate contempt
proceedings for remedial sanctions under ORS 33.055;
(b) UTCR that govern civil proceedings apply to original proceedings for remedial
sanctions under ORS 33.055;
(c) UTCR and ORAP that govern criminal proceedings apply respectively to
original and appellate contempt proceedings for punitive sanctions under
ORS 33.065.
(2) On its own motion or that of a party in a contempt proceeding for remedial
sanctions, a court may determine that a specific rule of procedure would not foster
the fair and efficient resolution of the contempt proceeding.
(a) When a court makes that determination, it may modify the specific rule or
adopt a different rule for all or part of the proceeding, so long as the modified
or new rule fosters the fair and efficient resolution of the proceeding. Under
this rule, the court may increase or decrease time limits or may limit or
exclude responsive pleadings, or both, and may also modify other rule
provisions.
(b) The court must give all parties to the proceeding notice that describes the
modified or new rule. The notice must be in writing or on the record or both.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.oregon.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
e781da07e47d5ec44e091e15ed3c4e8f80497832364e72119e50e4b380d63a24
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.