Bindinglaw

OR · rules

ORCP 31

INTERPLEADER

activein force · 2026-01-01 – presentact-effective-date

A Parties. Persons having claims against the plaintiff may be joined as defendants and required to interplead when their claims are such that the plaintiff is or may be exposed to double or multiple liability. It is not a ground for objection to the joinder that the claims of the several claimants, or the titles on which their claims depend, do not have a common origin or are not identical but are adverse to and independent of one another, or that the plaintiff alleges that plaintiff is not liable in whole or in part to any or all of the claimants. A defendant exposed to similar liability may obtain interpleader by way of cross-claim or counterclaim. The provisions of this rule supplement and do not in any way limit the joinder of parties otherwise permitted by rule or statute.

B Procedure. Any property or amount involved as to which the plaintiff admits liability may, upon order of the court, be deposited with the court or otherwise preserved, or secured by bond in an amount sufficient to assure payment of the liability admitted. The court may thereafter enjoin all parties before it from commencing or prosecuting any other action regarding the subject matter of the interpleader action. Upon hearing, the court may order the plaintiff discharged from liability as to property deposited or secured before determining the rights of the claimants thereto.

C Attorney fees.

C(1) Generally. In any action or for any cross-claim or counterclaim in interpleader filed pursuant to this rule, the party interpleading funds may be awarded a reasonable attorney fee in addition to costs and disbursements upon the court ordering that the funds or property interpled be deposited with the court, secured, or otherwise preserved. Further, the party interpleading funds will be discharged from liability as to the funds or property. The attorney fees awarded shall be assessed against and paid from the funds or property ordered interpled by the court. In determining whether to deny or to award in whole or in part a requested amount of attorney fees, the court must consider ORS 20.075 and the following additional factors:

C(1)(a) whether, as a matter of equity, the party interpleading funds is involved in the dispute in a way that it should not be awarded attorney fees as a result of the dispute;

C(1)(b) whether the party interpleading funds was subject to multiple litigation; and

C(1)(c) whether the interpleader was in the interests of justice and furthered resolution of the dispute.

C(2) Sureties. Section C of this rule does not apply to a party who has been compensated for acting as a surety with respect to the funds or property interpled.

History

[CCP 12/2/78; amended by 1991 c.733 §1; §§A,C amended by CCP 12/12/20]

Provenance

Source
oregonlegislature.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
d96d2fd7ee619cd2deea4223daa8c57b30a50e7540022f1f8812bdd422e82897
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
ORCP 31 — INTERPLEADER · binding.law