Bindinglaw

OR · rules

ORAP 8.47

NOTIFICATION OF RELATED CASES

activein force · 2026-09-03 – presentact-effective-date

When a party files a brief in the Court of Appeals, if the party is aware of another case

pending in an appellate court that arises out of the same case or consolidated case, or that

involves the same transaction or event, the party must file a notice with the Court of Appeals

identifying the related case by case title and appellate case number. The notice must be a

separate document from the party’s brief. A party may likewise notify the Court of Appeals if

the party is aware of another case pending in an appellate court that raises the same or a closely

related issue. A party need not notify the Court of Appeals of a related case if another party has

already done so.

Provenance

Source
courts.oregon.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-25
Edition
2026-09-25
Content hash
27e5762f7d50feb4f3131aeceafce90b9f7cdf3d6d660e883949cb8d62a8e987
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
ORAP 8.47 — NOTIFICATION OF RELATED CASES · binding.law