Bindinglaw

OR · rules

ORAP 8.05

SUBSTITUTION OF PARTIES IN CIVIL CASES; EFFECT OF DEATH OR ABSCONDING OF DEFENDANT IN CRIMINAL CASES

activein force · 2026-09-03 – presentact-effective-date

(1) Oregon Rule of Civil Procedure (ORCP) 34, relating to substitution of parties in

civil cases, is adopted.

(2) (a) Any party who learns of the death of a defendant in a criminal case that is

pending on appeal shall notify the court and all other parties of the death within 28 days

after learning of the death. Any party may move to dismiss the appeal.

(b) If the appeal is from a judgment of conviction and sentence, the party

filing the notice also may, concurrently with filing the notice of the defendant's death, file

a memorandum addressing whether the court should dismiss the appeal or vacate the

judgment, or both. Within 28 days after the filing of the notice of the defendant's death,

any other party or interested person may file a memorandum addressing the same issues.

(c) The following are presumptive dispositions under this subsection:

(i) For a state's appeal, the court will dismiss the appeal.

(ii) For a defendant's appeal, if the defendant has made an assignment

of error that, if successful, would result in reversal of the conviction, the court

will vacate the judgment and dismiss the appeal.

(iii) For a defendant's appeal, if the defendant has assigned error only

to a part of the sentence other than a monetary provision, the court will dismiss

the appeal but will not vacate the judgment. If the defendant has assigned error to

a monetary provision of the sentence, the court will dismiss the appeal and vacate

the challenged monetary provision, but will not vacate the remainder of the

judgment.

(iv) Notwithstanding subparagraphs (ii) and (iii) of this paragraph, if

the defendant dies after issuance of a Court of Appeals decision affirming the

judgment and after all right to petition for review has expired, the court will

dismiss the appeal but will not vacate the judgment.

(3) If a defendant in a criminal case, a petitioner in a post-conviction relief

proceeding, a plaintiff in a habeas corpus proceeding, a petitioner in a parole review proceeding,

or a petitioner in a prison disciplinary case, on appeal of an adverse decision, escapes or

absconds from custody or supervision, the respondent on appeal may move for dismissal of the

appeal. If the court determines that the appellant is on escape or abscond status at the time the

court decides the motion, the court may dismiss the appeal or judicial review. If the court has

not been advised otherwise, the court may infer that the appellant remains on escape or abscond

status when the court considers and decides the motion.

Provenance

Source
courts.oregon.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-25
Edition
2026-09-25
Content hash
26670773b9f9074374f06fb8612ce29025d0198489ccf20999ff5073af18631a
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
ORAP 8.05 — SUBSTITUTION OF PARTIES IN CIVIL CASES; E… · binding.law