OR · rules
ORAP 7.50
MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE IN COURT-APPOINTED COUNSEL CASES
(1) Except as provided otherwise by statute,[fn 1] in any case in which one of the parties is
represented by court-appointed counsel,[fn 2] the court on motion of the respondent may summarily
affirm the judgment if the court concludes, after submission of the appellant's opening brief and
without submission of the respondent's answering brief, that the appeal does not present a
substantial question of law. The Chief Judge may deny a motion for summary affirmance and
may grant an unopposed motion for summary affirmance. Only the court may grant, in the
manner provided by ORS 2.570, a motion for summary affirmance to which the appellant has
filed written opposition. A summary affirmance under this rule constitutes a decision on the
merits of the appeal.
(2) If a motion for summary affirmance is filed under ORS 138.225, ORS 138.660, or
ORS 34.712, or subsection (1) of this rule and counsel has filed a Balfour brief under ORAP 5.90
with a Section B or, with leave of the court, counsel's client has filed a supplemental pro se
brief,[fn 3] counsel forthwith shall forward a copy of the motion for summary affirmance to the
client. The client shall have 35 days after the date the motion for summary affirmance was filed
to file an answer to the motion.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.oregon.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-25
- Edition
- 2026-09-25
- Content hash
c0901611940937fb426c9e38902f11588b83311223ae6b9903d263c63c940d21
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.