OR · rules
ORAP 5.57
RESPONDENT'S ANSWERING BRIEF: CROSS-ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR
(1) A respondent must cross-assign as error any trial court ruling described in
subsection (2) of this rule in order to raise the claim of error in the appeal.[fn 1]
(2) A cross-assignment of error is appropriate:
(a) If, by challenging the trial court ruling, the respondent does not seek to
reverse or modify the judgment on appeal; and
(b) If the relief sought by the appellant were to be granted, respondent would
desire reversal or modification of an intermediate ruling of the trial court.
(3) The appellant's answer to a cross-assignment of error shall be in the form
prescribed by ORAP 5.55 for a respondent's answering brief and shall be:
(a) Contained in a separate section of the appellant's reply brief, if a reply
brief is permitted under ORAP 5.70, and designated "response to cross-assignment of
error;" or
(b) Filed within 21 days after the filing of the respondent's answering brief, if
a reply brief is not permitted under ORAP 5.70, and entitled "appellant's answer to cross-assignment of error."
(4) A respondent may file a reply to an appellant's answer to a cross-assignment of
error only if the nature of the case is one in which a reply brief is permitted under ORAP 5.70
and ORAP 5.80(3). The reply must comply with the requirements for a reply brief prescribed by
ORAP 5.05, and it must be filed within 21 days after the filing of the appellant's answer to a
cross-assignment of error.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.oregon.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-25
- Edition
- 2026-09-25
- Content hash
49ee93d3402376c304117ec71ab00098f0b76686df4110b3b3d4eda851dadb68
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.