Bindinglaw

OR · rules

ORAP 5.12

BRIEFS OR PETITIONS FOR REVIEW CHALLENGING CONSTITUTIONALITY OF STATUTES OR CONSTITUTION

activein force · 2026-09-03 – presentact-effective-date

A party filing a brief, petition for review, or petition invoking the court's original

jurisdiction that challenges the constitutionality of an Oregon statute or an Oregon constitutional

provision shall, at the time the brief or petition is filed, provide the Attorney General[fn 1] with a

copy of the brief or petition. The cover of the brief or petition shall state that the brief or petition

includes a challenge to the constitutionality of a statute or constitutional provision and shall

identify the statute or constitutional provision being challenged.

Provenance

Source
courts.oregon.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-25
Edition
2026-09-25
Content hash
d1689f2c94af4e22d7e67a4c402496660ef537ffed6271c7c8994b66c99d15b5
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.