OR · rules
ORAP 4.25
ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
(1) An application under ORS 183.482(5) for leave to present additional evidence on
judicial review shall be submitted as a motion. The motion shall be accompanied by an affidavit
describing the evidence sought to be presented, specifying why the evidence was not produced at
the agency hearing and stating whether an extension of time was requested for the purpose of
producing the evidence before the agency.
(2) When the court grants an application to present additional evidence pursuant to
ORS 183.482(5), it may designate the time in which the new evidence, together with the
agency's new findings and order, or certificate that it elects to stand on its original findings and
order, shall be filed with the court.
(3) The filing by the agency of the new evidence and findings and order, or certificate
that it elects to stand on its original findings and order, shall be accompanied by proof of service
of copies of the new evidence, except exhibits unless otherwise provided by law, and the
agency's new findings and order or certificate on all parties required to be served.
(4) The granting of an application to present additional evidence shall suspend the
time for filing briefs until the filing by the agency of the findings upon the additional evidence,
unless otherwise ordered by the court.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.oregon.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-25
- Edition
- 2026-09-25
- Content hash
0be24939b2a2db1c31b3d8592546d686bf0dfe564f8c166e06f41a7e7c18855f
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.