OR · rules
ORAP 12.15
COORDINATION OF CLASS ACTIONS IN TRIAL COURTS
The practice and procedure for coordination of class actions in circuit court shall be as
follows:
(1) A motion filed pursuant to ORCP 32 K shall set forth the grounds for
coordination and may be accompanied by an affidavit. Service by mail shall be made on all
counsel and the trial court administrators of the courts where the cases are pending. If the
motion is filed by a party, the presiding judge shall allow or deny it within 10 days. If the
motion is allowed, the presiding judge shall immediately request the Supreme Court to assign a
judge to determine whether coordination is appropriate and to forward to the Supreme Court a
copy of the motion and of the papers filed in support and in opposition to the motion.
(2) The Supreme Court will assign a judge, pursuant to ORCP 32 K(1)(a), within
seven days after receiving a request for the assignment, and shall notify by mail all counsel and
trial court administrators of the identity and address of the assigned judge. The Supreme Court
shall forward to the assigned judge copies of all papers accompanying the request for
appointment.
(3) Within 14 days after the Supreme Court designates the assigned judge, any party
may file a memorandum in favor of coordination and serve it on all counsel. Any party may
serve and file a memorandum in opposition to coordination within 21 days after the Supreme
Court designates the assigned judge. The assigned judge may take testimony and hear oral
argument on the issue of coordination. Within 28 days after being designated by the Supreme
Court, the assigned judge shall determine which, if any, cases are to be coordinated and, if any
are coordinated, recommend the court in which they shall proceed.
(4) In the absence of a stay order, a case which is being considered for coordination
may proceed as if no motion for coordination had been filed, but no trial shall be commenced
and no judgment shall be entered in that action.
(5) If the assigned judge orders coordination, the judge shall send a copy of the order
to the Chief Justice and to all counsel and the trial court administrators of the respective trial
courts. The Chief Justice shall sign an order within 14 days designating a trial judge and the
court where the coordinated cases will proceed and shall serve all counsel and trial court
administrators with a copy of the order. An order coordinating the cases shall operate as a stay
of all proceedings in the coordinated cases except as otherwise permitted by the trial judge
designated to hear them. If the assigned judge denies coordination, the judge shall send a copy
of the order to the Chief Justice and to all counsel and the trial court administrators of the
respective trial courts.
(6) The trial judge designated to hear the coordinated cases shall have full power to
control pleadings, discovery, notices, conferences, hearings, and the schedule of the trial or trials
in any manner the judge deems appropriate with due consideration to the convenience of the
witnesses, parties, and counsel, efficient judicial administration, and the ends of justice. The trial
judge may decoordinate all or some or one of the cases and may order any issue tried separately.
The trial judge shall pass on motions filed under ORCP 32 K(3) to include an additional case or
cases.
(7) On a showing of good cause, any time limit in this rule may be extended for a
period not exceeding seven days by the judge before whom the issue of coordination is then
pending.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.oregon.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-25
- Edition
- 2026-09-25
- Content hash
cd2c646603d4d971caa16b09193bf97a1930f7be37846dc7b3e8583e4f089e9e
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.