OR · rules
ORAP 11.40
REAPPORTIONMENT REVIEW: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS
The practice and procedure for a direct appeal to the Supreme Court concerning
reapportionment of the state into congressional districts under ORS 188.125 shall be as follows:
(1) Notice of appeal
(a) A notice of appeal filed under ORS 188.125(9)(b), challenging a decision
of the special judicial panel appointed pursuant to ORS 188.125(6) and (7) that dismissed
a petition under ORS 188.125(9)(a), shall be filed with the Administrator no later than
September 15 of the year in which the Legislative Assembly enacts the reapportionment.
(b) A notice of appeal filed under ORS 188.125(10)(b), challenging a decision
of the special judicial panel appointed pursuant to ORS 188.125(6) and (7) under ORS
188.125(10)(a), other than dismissal under ORS 188.125(9)(a), shall be filed with the
Administrator no later than October 15 of the year in which the Legislative Assembly
enacts the reapportionment.
(c) The notice of appeal shall:
(i) Comply, to the extent practicable, with ORAP 2.05, ORAP 2.10,
and ORAP 2.25; and
(ii) Be accompanied by the filing fee prescribed in ORS 21.010(5).
(2) The appellant in an appeal under either subsection (1)(a) or (b) shall file an
opening brief in support on the same date that the appellant files the notice of appeal. The brief
shall attach an excerpt of record that includes:
(a) Such part of the reapportionment as is necessary for a determination of the
question presented and the relief sought; and
(b) Any other part of the record necessary for a determination of the question
presented and the relief sought, including any proposed alternative reapportionment.[fn 1]
(3) The respondent in an appeal under either subsection (1)(a) or (b) shall file an
answering brief no later than five judicial days after the opening brief is filed.
(4) Reply briefs are discouraged, but, if an appellant in an appeal under either
subsection (1)(a) or (b) chooses to file a reply brief, the brief shall be filed no later than two
judicial days after the answering brief is filed.
(5) Amicus curiae appearances are discouraged, but, if a person applies for leave to
file an amicus curiae brief, the person shall file the application, accompanied by the brief
tendered for filing, no later than the date that the respondent's answering brief is due. The
following provisions of ORAP 8.15 apply to amicus curiae filings under this rule: ORAP
8.15(1), (2), (3), (5)(a)(iii), (6), (7), and (8), except that the provisions of ORAP 8.15(8)
regarding time to appear and prescribing due dates do not apply.
(6) Any brief in support of or in opposition to a notice of appeal, to the extent
practicable, shall be filed in the same form as a brief on appeal in a civil action under these rules.
(7) The following requirements apply to any notice of appeal, brief, or other
document required or permitted to be filed under this rule:
(a) All documents shall contain the litigant contact information required by
ORAP 1.30, including, whether the filing party is represented or not, an email address at
which the party can be served filings by others pursuant to ORCP 9 G and can receive
notices and other communications from the court.
(b) All documents shall be filed by 5:00 p.m. Pacific Time (PT) on the
deadline day, using one of the following filing methods and no other method:
(i) An attorney required to eFile a document pursuant to ORAP 16.60
shall submit it for eFiling by 5:00 p.m. PT on the deadline day, notwithstanding
ORAP 16.25(1);
(ii) A party not required to eFile a document under ORAP 16.60,
including a self-represented party, may physically deliver it by 5:00 p.m. PT to
the Supreme Court, 1163 State Street, Salem, Oregon 97301-2563; or
(iii) A self-represented party may email a document by 5:00 p.m. PT to
appealsclerk@ojd.state.or.us, with the following subject line: "Case Filing under
ORAP 11.40(7)(b)," notwithstanding ORAP 1.35(1)(a) and ORAP 1.32(1)(b) and
(c). Any document that is filed by email shall comply, to the extent practicable,
with the format requirements set out in ORAP 16.15. A party who files a
document by email under this subsection shall comply with any subsequent
instruction regarding payment of an applicable filing fee and shall respond to and
comply with any other inquiry or direction sent from the Administrator or the
Administrator's designee.
(c) Any document rejected based on a filing deficiency shall be corrected and
refiled by 7:00 p.m. PT on the deadline day.
(d) Any document that is filed shall be served on the other parties, and on any
other person required in this rule, on the same day the document is filed and, if filed on
the deadline day, by 5:00 p.m. PT. The serving party shall use one of the following
service methods and no other method:
(i) If applicable, electronic service pursuant to ORAP 16.45;
(ii) Email service pursuant to ORCP 9 G; or
(iii) Hand delivery.
(e) Any document that is filed shall include proof of service, describing the
person or persons served, the date of service, and the method of service as required by
subsection (7)(d).
(8) The court may invite oral argument from any appellant or respondent.
(9) A petition for reconsideration may be filed for only the purpose of correcting a
misstatement or inaccuracy. Any such petition is due within 1 judicial day after issuance of a
decision. The Administrator shall not accept for filing, and the court will not consider, any
petition tendered for filing after a reapportionment has become operative under ORS
188.125(14).
Provenance
- Source
- courts.oregon.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-25
- Edition
- 2026-09-25
- Content hash
4b5c242fc71778fbe1700244714648bd7bb5fc5ebe8ced2489ec415aa93730a9
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.