OR · rules
ORAP 10.35
JOINT MOTIONS FOR RESOLUTION OF APPEALS BY UNPUBLISHED ORDER
(1) On joint motion of the parties to any appeal, a department of the Court of Appeals
may decide the merits of an appeal by unpublished order if the department determines;
(a) The appeal does not present a substantial question of law;
(b) All parties to the appeal agree both on the correct resolution of all
questions raised on appeal and on the appropriate disposition of the appeal; and
(c) A published opinion would not significantly benefit the bench, the bar, or
the public.
(2) Parties seeking relief based on the assertion that the appeal does not present a
substantial question of law must include a sufficient statement of facts of the case to show that
all of the questions raised on appeal are grounded in those facts.
(3) Parties are discouraged from moving for relief under this subsection when
resolution of the merits of the appeal would require the appellate court to try the cause anew
upon the record or to make one or more factual findings anew upon the record. The Court of
Appeals will exercise its discretion to grant relief under this subsection in such cases only in
exceptional circumstances.[fn 1]
Provenance
- Source
- courts.oregon.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-25
- Edition
- 2026-09-25
- Content hash
8c056c3356449ac86056ab08ada97ac4b2fe5957b94c14227f6973834f6133e4
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.