Bindinglaw

OR · rules

Or. Code Jud. Conduct R. 3.11

Responding to Judicial and Lawyer Misconduct

activein force · 2013-12-01 – presentact-effective-date

(A) A judge having knowledge that another judge has committed a

violation of this Code that raises a substantial question regarding the judge's

honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a judge in other respects, shall inform the

appropriate authority.

(B) A judge having knowledge that a lawyer has committed a violation

of the Oregon Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a substantial question

regarding the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other

respects, shall inform the appropriate authority.

(C) This rule does not apply to judges who obtain such knowledge while

participating in a loss prevention program of the Professional Liability Fund, such

as the Oregon Attorney Assistance Program.

Provenance

Source
courts.oregon.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-25
Edition
2026-09-25
Content hash
532e6f9f5478e0822b83c2e18c77056b9a2f7ae7ceea12eaf014477cd7ff5c5c
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Or. Code Jud. Conduct R. 3.11 — Responding to Judicia… · binding.law