OK · rules
Okla. & Canadian Cntys. Local R. 8
REFILING OF CASES
A. REFILING OF CASES
A. When either a civil or criminal case is terminated other than on its merits and the
same cause of action is thereafter refiled, the case shall be returned to the judge to
whom it was originally assigned or the judge’s successor, without regard to its case
number or the judge assigned randomly upon refiling.
1. Where a criminal case has been dismissed by order of the assigned Judge
under the provisions of 22 O.S. Section 815, after the Judge has sustained a
motion to suppress and dismissed the case on motion of the District
Attorney for the reason the State has no more evidence to present and in the
event the case is refiled by the District Attorney, then the refiled case shall
be randomly reassigned to a Judge other than the one who previously ruled
on the motion to suppress and the Judge to whom the subsequen t refiled
case is assigned shall not be bound by the prior ruling on the motion to
suppress.
2. When a case is refiled under the conditions set forth in Paragraph(A)(1) of
this Rule and the assigned Judge is the same Judge who ruled on the motion
to suppress referred to in Paragraph (A)(1) of this rule, then the District
Attorney shall prepare an order citing this rule and present the order for
signature to the assigned Judge, ordering the Oklahoma County Court Clerk
to randomly assign the case to a different Judge and the District Attorney
shall then file the order with the Court Clerk and the Court Clerk shall then
cause the case to be randomly assigned to a different Judge.
Approved August 21, 2025 5
B. The procedure for transferring such case is as follows: The party filing the case
shall immediately bring it to the attention of the newly assigned judge who shall
execute a transfer order transferring the case to the Chief Judge for reassignment to
the original judge. Upon failure of the party filing the case to cause the case to be
reassigned in accordance with this rule, any other party or attorney representing a
party having knowledge of the previous filing shall cause the case to be reassigned
to the original judge.
C. Any party to the case or their attorney having knowledge that the case should be
reassigned and failing to act in accordance with this rule may be sanctioned by the
Court for violation of Local Court Rules.
D. It should be noted that it is the cause of action rather than the identity of the parties
that is determinative of whether or not the case comes within the scope of this rule
and should be reassigned.
E. Any re-filed case shall recite in the petition/information the style, case number, and
name of the assigned judge of the previously filed case.
1. Attorneys and pro se litigants shall file a written notice with the court if they
are aware, after reasonable inquiry, of any companion or related case(s) filed
in any court involving common property or common issues of fact or
growing out of the same transaction.
2. The notice of related or companion case(s) should provide the name of the
court, the judge, and the case number(s) of the related or companion case(s).
Provenance
- Source
- www.oklahomacounty.org
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
a7b2b930e7978582d1ac03f57a77ded810b91078a679cdfb5a4d086fc5c6fd63
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.