OK · rules
Okla. Ct. Crim. App. R. 15.1
Purpose and Procedural Format
SECTION XV. PROCEDURES FOR APPEALING DISTRICT COURT ORDER
REVIEWING PRISON DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
THAT REVOKED EARNED CREDITS
RULE 15.1 PURPOSE AND PROCEDURAL FORMAT
(A) Purpose of Appellate Procedure. These procedures are to provide the manner of appeal from an order entered by a district court that makes final disposition of a prisoner’s petition for judicial review filed under Section 564.1 of Title 57.
(B) Format of the District Court Proceedings. As Oklahoma County is the official residence of the Oklahoma Department of Corrections, prisoners must file their petitions for judicial review in the District Court of Oklahoma County. 57 O.S. 564.1(A). Within the district court, the prisoner is designated "Petitioner" and the Department of Corrections is designated "Respondent." 57 O.S. 564.1(A)(1) & (2). (See Rule 15.3(B) for the designation of parties on appeal.) Petitions for judicial review under Section 564.1 of Title 57 may be filed only in instances where a prison disciplinary action has resulted in a revocation of earned credits without due process, and the prisoner has exhausted administrative remedies. When a petition has been properly filed, the district court shall determine whether the applicable level of due process was provided by the revoking authority, and if not, it must require the Oklahoma Department of Corrections to provide such due process.
Provenance
- Source
- www.okcca.net
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
e969de51570e51f3fda3e0fdad054cf572c67d9a04a328fc47665bf80e025ce4
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.