OK · jury_instructions
OUJI-CIV No. 9.45
WHITE VERDICT FORM, COMPARATIVE, TWO DEFENDANTS
WHITE VERDICT FORM, COMPARATIVE, TWO DEFENDANTS
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF ____________ COUNTY, STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Plaintiff,
vs. CASE NO.
Defendant
WHITE VERDICT FORM
We, the jury, empaneled and sworn in the above entitled cause, do, upon our
oaths, find as follows:
1. Plaintiff's, [name], contributory negligence _____ %
2. Defendant's, [name], negligence _____ %
3. Defendant's, [name], negligence _____ %
(1, 2 and 3 must total 100%) _____ %
TOTAL 100%
The following shall be answere d only if the percentage of Plaintiff's, [name],
contributory negligence is equal to or of lesser percentage than the negligence of the
Defendants, [name], and [name].
4. We find the dollar amount of damages sustained by the Plaintiff, [name],
without regard to the percentages of contributory negligence of the Plaintif f, [name], and
negligence of the Defendants, is the sum of $______________. This dollar amount will
be reduced by the judge by the percentage established in Item 1 above.
OUJI 3d (Rev. 2009) Chapter 9
Foreperson
OUJI 3d (Rev. 2009) Chapter 9
Provenance
- Source
- oscn.net
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-23
- Edition
- 2026-08-23
- Content hash
a7da0adc5c979c66cfbb96e45b26df080037e40b9b3f3d24f59539a58b8fc729
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.