Bindinglaw

OK · jury_instructions

OUJI-CIV No. 9.20

COMPARATIVE NEGLIGENCE: COUNTERCLAIM PLEAD — DEFINITION

activein force · 2026-01-01 – presentcompiled-edition

COMPARATIVE NEGLIGENCE: COUNTERCLAIM PLEAD — DEFINITION

As a part of [his/her] defense, [Defendant] first denies that any negligence on

[his/her] part was the direct caus e of the occurrence involved in this lawsuit and any

resulting injuries to [Plaintiff]. [Defendant] further contends that if, however, the jury

should find that [he/she] was negligent to some degree, then it is [his/her] contention that

[Plaintiff's] own negligence exceeded [Defendant's] negligence, so as to prevent any

recovery by [Plaintiff] in this lawsuit. To establish this defense, [Defendant] must show

by the greater weight of the evidence that [Plaintiff] was negligent and [his/her]

negligence was a direct cause of [his/her] injury.

As you have been previously advised in these instructions, by way of

counterclaim filed in this lawsuit, [Defendant] seeks to be awarded money damages from

[Plaintiff] because of this same occurrence. As a part of [his/ her] defense to

[Defendant's] counterclaim, [Plaintiff] first denies that any negligence on [his/her] part

was the direct cause of the occurrence and any resulting injuries to [Defendant].

[Plaintiff] further contends that if, however, the jury should find that [he/she] was

negligent to some degree, then it is [his/her] contention that [Defendant's] own

negligence exceeded [Plaintiff's] negligence, so as to prevent any recovery by

[Defendant] in this lawsuit. To establish this defense, [Plaintiff] must sho w by the greater

weight of the evidence that [Defendant] was negligent and [his/her] negligence was a

direct cause of [his/her] injury.

Under the law you are to compare the percentage (0% —100%) of negligence of

[Plaintiff], if any, with the percentage (0%—100%) of negligence of [Defendant], if any.

The law provides that [Defendant's] contributory negligence, which means the

negligence of [names of the Defendant counterclaimants], shall not bar recovery of

OUJI 3d (Rev. 2009) Chapter 9

damages on the counterclaims unless [his/her/their] negligence is of a greater degree,

established by percentage, than the negligence of [Plaintiff].

The percentage (0% —100%) of negligence you find for each party should be

stated in the appropriate verdict form. The verdict forms have been color –coded to assist

you.

Provenance

Source
oscn.net
Retrieved
2026-08-23
Edition
2026-08-23
Content hash
3943d676db001576a559c0e42c826efa8181ed99166994c1266afa00f40b00c4
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
OUJI-CIV No. 9.20 — COMPARATIVE NEGLIGENCE: COUNTERCL… · binding.law