Bindinglaw

OK · jury_instructions

OUJI-CIV No. 3.11A

INFERENCE FROM SPOLIATION OF EVIDENCE

activein force · 2026-01-01 – presentcompiled-edition

INFERENCE FROM SPOLIATION OF EVIDENCE

[Name of Party] had a duty to preserve [Specify Evidence] in this case and

[Name of Party] destroyed/hid/[failed to preserve] the evidence. You may therefore

conclude that the evidence would have been unfavorable to [Name of Party].

Provenance

Source
oscn.net
Retrieved
2026-08-23
Edition
2026-08-23
Content hash
fdcab83066cd39a02e033520286ac31031ca711e7f7e53c191b92599208fe0c8
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
OUJI-CIV No. 3.11A — INFERENCE FROM SPOLIATION OF EVI… · binding.law