OK · jury_instructions
OUJI-CIV No. 26.2
BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY - EXISTENCE OF FIDUCIARY RELATIONSHIP
BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY - EXISTENCE OF FIDUCIARY RELATIONSHIP
You are instructed that a fiduciary relationship existed in this case between
[Plaintiff] and [Defendant].
OR
You are instructed that if you determine that [Specify Grounds for Fiduciary
Relationship, e.g., [Defendant] was the [guardian, employee, partner, attorney,
accountant, banker, physician, etc.] of [Plaintiff]], then a fiduciary relationship existed
in this case between [Plaintiff] and [Defendant].
OR
You must determine whether a fiduciary re lationship existed in this case between
[Plaintiff] and [Defendant] based upon their relationship an d the other circumstances in
this case. A fiduciary relationship exists wh enever trust and confidence are reasonably
placed by one person in the integrity and loyalty of another, and the other person
knowingly accepts that trust and confidence and then undertakes to act on behalf of the
person.
OUJI 3d (Rev. 2009) Chapter 26
Provenance
- Source
- oscn.net
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-23
- Edition
- 2026-08-23
- Content hash
e215af3b07063f2f7dffcdc2fa81811cf1cefd1122ef8d2081394aced9db93b2
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.