OK · jury_instructions
OUJI-CIV No. 24.1
Interference with Contract --- Elements
Interference with Contract --- Elements
[Plaintiff] claims that [he/she/it] had a contract with [Third Party] in
which they had agreed to [Describe the terms of the contract]. [Plaintiff] also
claims that [Defendant] intentionally and wrongfully interfered with this
contract, and that [he/she/i t] suffered damages as a direct result. In order to
win on the claim of intentional interference with a contract, [Plaintiff] must
show by the weight of the evidence that:
1. [Plaintiff] had a contract with [Third Party];
2. [Defendant] knew [or under the circumstances reasonab ly should
have known] about the contract;
3. [Defendant] interfered with the contract [or induced the Third Party
to breach the contract, or made it impossible fo r the contract to
be performed];
4. [Defendant]'s conduct was intentional;
5. [Defendant] used improper or unfair means; and
6. [Plaintiff] suffered damages as a direct result of [Defendant]'s
actions.
OUJI 3d (Rev. 2009) Chapter 24
Provenance
- Source
- oscn.net
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-23
- Edition
- 2026-08-23
- Content hash
55414dc2273f6f9575a72fcbfde25e11bb38f537a1b7602053c98a2a272e41c2
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.