OK · jury_instructions
OUJI-CIV No. 23.25A
has been drafted for cases where the contract requires a
party's performance to the satisfacti on of the other party, and there is a jury question
whether satisfaction is determined by a subjective or objective standard. In cases where
there is no jury question as to whether satisfaction should be measured by a subjective or
objective standard, the paragraph should be shortened by deleting the second through
fourth sentences and redrafting the fifth sentence to reflect whichever standard was
intended.
OUJI 3d (Rev. 2009) Chapter 23
Instruction No, 23.25B has been drafted fo r cases where the contract requires a
party's performance to the satisfaction of a third party, such as an architect or engineer,
and there is a jury question whether the third party's determination was to be absolutely
binding on the parties. In cases where there is no jury que stion as to whether the third
party's determination was to be absolutely binding, the paragraph should be shortened by
deleting the second and third sentences and redrafting the fourth sentence by replacing
the words "if you decide that" with "though."
Provenance
- Source
- oscn.net
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-23
- Edition
- 2026-08-23
- Content hash
2a375c2742565e669b7a0428e7d13e889bddbf309de0540338b7797bea9a7f7d
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.