Bindinglaw

OK · jury_instructions

OUJI-CIV No. 22.7

EXEMPLARY OR PUNITIVE DAMAGES - SECOND STAGE

activein force · 2026-01-01 – presentcompiled-edition

EXEMPLARY OR PUNITIVE DAMAGES - SECOND STAGE

Ladies and Gentlemen of the jury, you have found in favor of the plaintiff and

granted him/her actual damages, and you have also found by a separate verdict that the

defendant has (recklessly disregarded its duty to deal fairly and act in good faith with

its insured, [Plaintiff) (and/or) (intentionally and with malice breached its duty to

deal fairly and act in good faith with its insured, [Plaintiff]).

You may now, in addition to actual damages, grant the plaintiff punitive damages

in such sum as you reasonably believe will punish defendant and be an example to others.

Punitive damages are not to be considered as compensation to [Plaintiff], but as

punishment to [Defendant], and as an example to others to deter them from like conduct.

The law does not require you to award punitive damages, and if you do so, you must use

sound reason in setting the amount. You should be aware that the purpose of punitive

damages is to punish and not to destroy a defendant.

[You may consider evidence of actual harm to others in determining the

seriousness of the hazard to the public, and thus whether the conduct that harmed

the plaintiff was particularly reprehensible or bad. Conduct that risks harm to

many may be more reprehensible than conduct that risks harm to only a few.

OUJI 3d (Rev. 2009) Chapter 22

However, you may not use punitive damages to punish [Defendant] directly on

account of harms that [Defendant] may have caused to others.]

In determining the amount of punitive damages, you may consider the following

factors:

1. The seriousness of the hazard to the public arising from [Defendant]’s

misconduct;

2. The profitability of the misconduct to [Defendant];

3. How long the conduct lasted and whether it is likely to continue;

4. Whether there were attempts to conceal the misconduct;

5. How aware [Defendant] was of the conduct and its consequences and how

aware [Defendant] was of the hazard and of its excessiveness;

6. The attitude and conduct of [Defendant] upon finding out about the

misconduct/hazard;

7. The financial condition of [Defendant];

8. (If the defendant is a corporation or other entity) The number and level of

employees involved in causing or concealing the misconduct.

In no event should the punitive damages exceed the greater of: (Select One)

[$100,000.00 or the amount of actual damages you have previously awarded].

OR

[$500,000.00, or twice the amount of actual damages you have previously

awarded, or the increased financial benefit derived by the defendant as a direct

result of the conduct causing the injury to the plaintiff and other persons or

entities].

Provenance

Source
oscn.net
Retrieved
2026-08-23
Edition
2026-08-23
Content hash
a453263d2d50d9d041c0fd72eed260eab27d71dfe44872a7cc01e03aa6f5f6f3
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
OUJI-CIV No. 22.7 — EXEMPLARY OR PUNITIVE DAMAGES - S… · binding.law