OK · jury_instructions
OUJI-CIV No. 22.2
BAD FAITH --- FIRST PARTY INSURANCE --- FAILURE TO PAY CLAIM OF
BAD FAITH --- FIRST PARTY INSURANCE --- FAILURE TO PAY CLAIM OF
INSURED
[Plaintiff] claims that [the Insurer] viol ated its duty of good faith and fair dealing
by unreasonably, and in bad faith, refusing to pay [Plaintiff] the proper amount for a valid
claim under the insurance policy. In order for [Plaintiff] to recover damages in this case,
[he/she] must show by the greater weight of the evidence that:
1. [The Insurer] was required under the insurance policy to pay [Plaintiff's] claim;
2. [The Insurer's] refusal to pay the claim in full was unreasonable under the
circumstances, because [for example, that 1) it did not perform a proper
investigation, 2) it did not evaluate the results of the investigation properly, 3)
OUJI 3d (Rev. 2009) Chapter 22
it had no reasonable basis for the refusal, or 4) the amount it offered to satisfy
the claim was unreasonably low];
3. [The Insurer] did not deal fairly and in good faith with [Plaintiff]; and
4. The violation by [The Insurer] of its duty of good faith and fair dealing was
the direct cause of the injury sustained by [Plaintiff].
Provenance
- Source
- oscn.net
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-23
- Edition
- 2026-08-23
- Content hash
febec255979d12c7986ac2d16b5bafc98fcf2a8980091831a1f926df2f642463
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.