OK · jury_instructions
OUJI-CIV No. 2.2
THE ISSUES IN THE CASE — COUNTERCLAIM
THE ISSUES IN THE CASE — COUNTERCLAIM
Each party to this action claims to be entitled to damage from the other.
The parties to this case are: [name of Plaintiff], th e Plaintiff, and [name of
Defendant], the Defendant.
The parties admit:
[State the essential elements of the claim, using simple language based on the
pleadings and the pretrial order and avoiding use of t echnical terms and words such as
"allege" or "contend." Each statement s hould include reference to time, place, and
circumstances.]. For example:
OUJI 3d (Rev. 2009) Chapter 2
[Plaintiff] claims that [he/she] sustained injuries which were directly caused by
the negligence of [Defendant] in one or more of the following respects:
A. In failing to keep a careful lookout;
B. In driving to the left of the center of the road.
[Defendant] claims:
[Describe the defendant's denials and affirmative defenses.] For example:
[Defendant] denies that [he/she] was negligent in doing any of the things claimed
by [Plaintiff] and that [Plaintiff] was injured, and for an additional defense claims that
[Plaintiff] was contributorily negligent, which contribut ed to bringing about the
occurrence, in one or more the following respects:
A. In failing to keep a careful lookout;
B. In driving under the influence of intoxicating liquors.
As a counterclaim against [Plaintiff], [Defendant] further claims:
[State the essential elements of the counterclaim.].
As to the counterclaim, [Plaintiff] claims:
[Describe the plaintiff's denials and affirmative defense to counterclaim.].
These are the issues you are to determine.
Provenance
- Source
- oscn.net
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-23
- Edition
- 2026-08-23
- Content hash
e39bd945af88eafa6800e652fcf9277c7a586ad8ff5dc10b09bba98528dc331b
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.