OK · jury_instructions
OUJI-CIV No. 12.10
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE OF VOLUNTARY ASSUMPTION OF THE RISK OF A
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE OF VOLUNTARY ASSUMPTION OF THE RISK OF A
KNOWN DEFECT
[Defendant] has raised the defense in this case that [Plaintiff] voluntarily assumed
the risk of injury from a known defect in the [product]. Assumption of the risk occurs
where a person voluntarily and unreasonably exposes [himself/herself] to a known,
appreciated, and avoidable danger of injury from the defect in the [product]. To establish
this defense, [Defendant] must show by the weight of the evidence that:
1. A defect in the [product] existed, which created a risk of injury;
2. [Plaintiff] knew of the risk and appreciated the degree of danger;
3. [Plaintiff] had the opportunity to avoid the risk; and
4. [Plaintiff]'s use of the [product] wa s voluntary and unreasonable and was the
direct cause of [his/her] injury.
OUJI 3d (Rev. 2009) Chapter 12
Provenance
- Source
- oscn.net
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-23
- Edition
- 2026-08-23
- Content hash
ef4ec5d736388c7be6a68cef770d0d413efacd5afcaba2a928e56f9bbc81784d
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.