OH · rules
Ohio Sup.R. 9.22
Video Remote Interpretation Placement Logistics
(A) Visibility
All participants, interpreters, parties, judicial officers, court personnel, and attorneys shall
be completely and clearly visible on the screen.
(B) Virtual backgrounds
Sign language interpreters and deaf or hard-of-hearing individuals and witnesses shall not
use virtual backgrounds. Movement on the video disrupts the stability of the virtual
background and may cause the sign language to be unclear.
(C) Video feeds
(1) A total of nine visible video feeds on the screen is recommended. However, no
more than nine visible video feeds should be on the screen, as the visible video feed
of the sign language interpreter and the deaf or hard- of-hearing individual are
reduced in size, making visibility of small hand and face movement difficult. If
more than twelve visible video feeds are necessary, technology shall be used to
allow the visible video feed of the sign language interpreter and the deaf or hard -
of-hearing individual to remain in a stable location on the screen or to be larger than
other participants.
(2) Participants may not turn their video feed off and on once the proceeding has begun.
Doing so may cause movement of individual visible video feed locations on the
screen and disrupt the ability to seamlessly view the foreign language interpreter,
the limited English proficient person, sign language interpreter, or deaf or hard-of-hearing individual. If it is critical that a video feed be turned off and on during the
proceeding, technology should be used to allow the visible video feed of the limited
English speaker, foreign language interpreter, sign language interpreter, and the
deaf or hard-of-hearing individual to remain in a stable location on the screen or to
be larger than other participants.
(3) Participants on the device screen shall be visible from approximately the waist to
the top of the head to allow the deaf or hard- of-hearing individual to read
participants’ facial expressions and body language.
(D) Video screens
(1) Video screens used in the courtroom should be mobile to accommodate a variety of
remote interpreting configurations.
(2) When a sign language interpreter is remote and the individual, the judicial officer,
court personnel, and attorneys are in the courtroom, the video screen should be
placed so the deaf or hard-of-hearing individual can see both the interpreter and the
judge in the same line of sight.
(3) Beware of using small tablets or phones with small screens that may not be
adequate for sign language interpreting.
(E) Video camera placement
(1) Video camera placement in the courtroom shall allow for complete and clear
visibility of a sign language interpreter and deaf or hard- of-hearing individual in a
variety of remote interpreting configurations. Video cameras should be
independent of the video screen and stationary during the proceeding.
(2) When a sign language interpreter is remote and the deaf or hard-of-hearing
individual, the judicial officer, court personnel, and attorneys are in the courtroom,
the video camera should be located so the deaf or hard- of-hearing individual is
framed to be visible from approximately the waist to the top of the head.
(3) When a sign language interpreter and the deaf or hard-of-hearing individual are
remote and the judicial officer, court personnel, and attorneys are in the courtroom,
the video camera should be located so the interpreter and the deaf or hard- of-hearing individual can see the various parties in the courtroom.
(4) When the deaf or hard-of-hearing individual is remote and the judicial officer, court
personnel, and attorneys are in the courtroom, the video camera in the external
location should be located so the deaf or hard- of-hearing individual is clearly and
completely visible to the sign language interpreter. The video camera in the
courtroom should be placed so the sign language interpreter, as well as those in the
courtroom who will be speaking primarily, are clearly and completely visible to the
deaf or hard-of-hearing individual.
(F) Audio
(1) Audio shall allow for all to clearly hear what is being said by the interpreter, the
judicial officer, court personnel, and attorney throughout the courtroom.
(2) When any participant is remote while others are in the courtroom, sound from the
video screen should be amplified in some manner. Additionally, sound from the
courtroom should be amplified in some manner so as to be audible to the interpreter,
regardless of where the deaf or hard-of-hearing individual is in the courtroom.
(3) When all participants are remote, participants who will be using spoken language
to communicate may use a microphone that is independent of the built-in
microphone on the computer.
History
Effective Date: July 1, 2023 Amended: November 13, 2025 Commentary Ideally, the screen will be placed so that the interpreter is also able to see everyone in the courtroom, save the judge. In this way, identification of who is speaking is more readily accomplished than by relying on the ability to discriminate between disembodied voices. This may require a larger screen than the minimum recommendation in this standard. Polycom and other such platforms have video cameras that may be adjustable enough despite being somewhat stationary. Ideally, multiple video cameras would be employed to allow those who are remote to be able to clearly see all who are in the courtroom. As noted in this standard, this increases the effectiveness of the interpretation. Video cameras that are fixed to a ceiling location that record courtroom activity for safety and security purposes are not adequate to allow for effective remote sign language interpretation. Commentary (July 1, 2026) Appendix G, Standard 2 was renumbered to Rule 9.22 as part of the 2026 restructuring of the Rules of Superintendence.
Provenance
- Source
- supremecourt.ohio.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-14
- Edition
- 2026-09-14
- Content hash
9d8b8799fa7f2f05fcd91ac987cabd222a61b7c760d03088ba7b68ad94029afe
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.