OH · rules
Ohio Sup.R. 8.12
Local Custody Evaluator Rule
A court of common pleas that appoints custody evaluators shall adopt local rules governing
appointment. The local rules shall do both of the following:
(A) Establish a process for submitting in electronic format or hard copy comments and
complaints regarding the performance of custody evaluators appointed by the court
and for considering such comments and complaints. The process shall include each
of the following:
(1) The designation of a person for accepting and considering
comments and complaints;
(2) A requirement that a copy of the submitted comment or complaint
be provided to the custody evaluator who is the subject of the
comment or complaint;
(3) A requirement that the court give prompt consideration to the
comment or complaint and take appropriate action;
(4) A requirement that the court maintain a record, indicating where the
filed comments and complaints will be kept, regarding the nature
and disposition of the comment or complaint;
(5) A requirement that the court notify the person making the comment
or complaint and the custody evaluator of the disposition of the
comment or complaint.
(B) Address other provisions as the court considers necessary and appropriate.
History
Effective Date: September 1, 2022 Commentary (July 1, 2026) Rule 91.03 was renumbered to Rule 8. 12 as part of the 2026 restructuring of the Rules of Superintendence.
Provenance
- Source
- supremecourt.ohio.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-14
- Edition
- 2026-09-14
- Content hash
f4e3fd41aa3b965b321f6b6c6186425014b952ef41fd743d02c3bfdcdca03e0e
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.