OH · rules
Ohio Sup.R. 7.30
Professional Education (Specialized Docket Standard 11)
(A) General
A specialized docket should assure continuing interdisciplinary education of advisory
committee members, treatment team members, and personnel to promote effective
specialized docket planning, implementation, and operations.
(B) Continuing education plan
A specialized docket should establish and maintain a viable continuing education plan for
specialized docket personnel.
(C) Treatment team
(1) Treatment team members should make reasonable efforts to observe all required
specialized docket service provider programs to gain confidence in the services
provided and to better understand the treatment and programming process.
(2) A specialized docket should plan for the transition of a treatment team member and
provide sufficient training and program document for new treatment team
members.
(3) For consistency in the non- adversarial approach, prosecutors and defense counsel
should be trained in specialized docket processes.
(D) Judicial knowledge
The specialized docket judge should be knowledgeable about treatment and programming
methods and limitations of the methods.
History
Effective Date: January 1, 2013 Amended: January 1, 2021; July 10, 2025 Commentary (July 1, 2026) Appendix I, Standard 11 was renumbered to Rule 7.30 as part of the 2026 restructuring of the Rules of Superintendence.
Provenance
- Source
- supremecourt.ohio.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-14
- Edition
- 2026-09-14
- Content hash
a73705cc2769ee1dba16db01da6c1072ea4a588427f3dfb5d55a7cf87740c741
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.