OH · rules
Ohio Sup.R. 7.20
Planning Process (Specialized Docket Standard 1)
A specialized docket shall utilize a comprehensive and collaborative planning process that includes
all of the following:
(A) An advisory committee. All of the following apply to the advisory committee:
(1) The advisory committee shall be comprised of a multidisciplinary
team of key officials, policymakers, and relevant parties needed to
support the effective operations of the specialized docket. The
relevant parties should represent criminal justice represe ntatives;
treatment representatives, including mental health, substance abuse,
medical, and other treatment areas; and community stakeholders.
The relevant parties may include, but are not limited to, the
following:
(a) The specialized docket judge;
(b) The court;
(c) The prosecutor;
(d) Defense counsel;
(e) Licensed treatment providers;
(f) Children services for family dependency treatment
dockets;
(g) The probation department and the parole authority
for criminal and juvenile dockets;
(h) Law enforcement agencies;
(i) The veterans administration for veterans dockets;
(j) Funding authorities;
(k) Community-based service providers.
(2) The advisory committee should provide oversight on policies and
procedures, facilitate agreements with partner agencies, improve the
quality and expand the quantity of available services, garner
political and community support for the specialized docket, evaluate
specialized docket effectiveness, and plan for the sustainability of
the specialized docket;
(3) The advisory committee shall establish and monitor measurable
goals and objectives for the specialized docket;
(4) Advisory committee meetings shall include the specialized docket
judge, who shall attend and serve as the chair of the committee. In
the event of a shared advisory committee, each specialized docket
judge shall chair the portion of the agenda concerning t hat judge’s
docket.
(B) A local rule or an administrative order authorizing the operation of the specialized
docket.
(C) A program description that contains written policies and procedures that
demonstrate compliance with all specialized docket certification requirements. The
judge of a court or division establishing a specialized docket should incorporate
national best practices for the particular type of docket and participants to be served.
(D) A written participation agreement and participant handbook detailing the rights and
responsibilities of participants in the specialized docket;
(E) A process that is non-adversarial, but recognizes the distinct role of a prosecutor in
pursuing justice and protecting public safety and victim’s rights and the distinct role
of a defense counsel in preserving the constitutional rights of a specialized docket
participant.
History
Effective Date: January 1, 2013 Amended: January 1, 2021; July 10, 2025 Commentary (July 1, 2026) Appendix I, Standard 1 was renumbered to Rule 7.20 as part of the 2026 restructuring of the Rules of Superintendence.
Provenance
- Source
- supremecourt.ohio.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-14
- Edition
- 2026-09-14
- Content hash
56e95228b2b2c977c475fb48671c8363dc9329fc9f4824d76435f15df866ec15
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.