OH · rules
Ohio Sup.R. 7.05
Site Review
(A) Performance of site review
Staff of the Specialized Dockets Section of the Supreme Court shall conduct a site review
of the treatment team meeting and status review hearing for a court of common pleas,
municipal court, or county court or division of the court that has received initi al
certification pursuant to Sup.R. 7.04. The section shall provide the judge of the court or
division notice by regular or electronic mail specifying the date and time for the visit and
identifying which staff of the court or division shall be available for interview during the
visit. If the identified staff are not available for interview during the visit, the manager of
the section, pursuant to Sup.R. 7.06(A), may recommend the application be denied.
(B) Unsatisfactory site review
If upon conducting the site review pursuant to division (A) of this rule a deficiency is
identified, staff of the section shall provide the judge of the court or division technical
assistance pursuant to Sup.R.7.09(B). If technical assistance does not resolve the
deficiency, staff of the section shall provide the judge of the court or division notice by
regular or electronic mail identifying the deficiency. Staff of the section may conduct
additional site reviews to verify compliance. If the judge fails to correct the deficiency
within forty-five days after the notice is issued, the manager of section, pursuant to Sup.R.
7.06(A), may recommend the application be denied.
History
Effective Date: January 1, 2013 Amended: January 1, 2021 Commentary (July 1, 2026) Rule 36.25 was renumbered to Rule 7.05 as part of the 2026 restructuring of the Rules of Superintendence.
Provenance
- Source
- supremecourt.ohio.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-14
- Edition
- 2026-09-14
- Content hash
35c3db44e04970c51cda869d7237c02b2fcdf6925a500988e1d9217926d071b8
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.