Bindinglaw

OH · rules

Ohio Sup.R. 4.13

Restrictions, Limitations, Modification, or Vacation of Administrative Judge Actions

activein force · 2026-06-04 – presentact-effective-date

(A) In a multi-judge court or division of a court, the administrative judge has no authority over

personal, fiduciary, or confidential judicial staff of individual judges, except in instances

where budgetary, operational, or professional conduct affecting the court or division as a

whole compel the intervention of the administrative judge.

(B) In a multi-judge court or division of a court, the administrative judge shall not terminate

any staff shared by the court or division without taking into consideration the opinions and

concerns of judicial colleagues, except in instances where budgetary, operational, or

professional conduct affecting the court or division as a whole compel the intervention of

the administrative judge.

(C) The judges of a multi-judge court or division of a court, by majority vote, may modify or

vacate the actions of the administrative judge of the court or division. In the event of a tie,

the judges may utilize the Government Conflict Resolution Services Program of the

Supreme Court of Ohio.

History

Effective Date: December 1, 2012; June 4, 2026 Commentary (July 1, 2026) Rule 4.02 was renumbered to Rule 4.13 as part of the 2026 restructuring of the Rules of Superintendence.

Provenance

Source
supremecourt.ohio.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-14
Edition
2026-09-14
Content hash
2341ea6446614512817c835a52afd5d1f13edccf1aef3d840be4c96fe6b6e5c6
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Ohio Sup.R. 4.13 — Restrictions, Limitations, Modific… · binding.law