Bindinglaw

OH · rules

Ohio Sup.R. 14.21

Restricted Access to Offices

activein force · 2009-03-01 – presentact-effective-date

To ensure safe and secure work areas and to protect against inappropriate interaction between

judges and participants in the judicial process, an effective secondary security perimeter should be

utilized at the entrance to the office space housing judges and court personnel.

History

Effective Date: October 17, 1994 Amended: March 1, 2009 Commentary The security of the office space housing judges and court personnel must be maintained. Unlimited access to these areas is dangerous and unnecessary. The general public should not be permitted to wander through these areas for any reason. However, attorneys should have controlled access to the areas. Persons having business with a judge or court personnel should be encouraged to make appointments. Steps which may be taken to facilitate this standard include a main receptionist checkpoint, passive or active electromagnetic hall locks, and cardreader door locks. Also, the judges' chambers, as differentiated from the staff offices, and judges' parking spaces should not be designated by "Judge" signage. Finally, parking spaces should be located as close as possible to an entrance. Commentary (July 1, 2026) Appendix C, Standard 11 was renumbered to Rule 14.21 as part of the 2026 restructuring of the Rules of Superintendence.

Provenance

Source
supremecourt.ohio.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-14
Edition
2026-09-14
Content hash
61d4d8d292ba1347a9e719f36a2fa9c8be2c90a215e3eb57ff42a8ff7715d90a
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.