Bindinglaw

OH · rules

Ohio S.Ct.Prac.R. 7.03

Memorandum in Response to Memorandum in Support of Jurisdiction

activein force · 2025-04-01 – presentact-effective-date

(A) Deadline for filing

(1) Subject to divisions (A)(2) and (A)(3) of this rule, an appellee may file a

memorandum in response to a memorandum in support of jurisdiction within thirty days

after an appellant’s memorandum in support of jurisdiction is filed.

(2) If the appeal involves termination of parental rights or adoption of a minor child,

or both, or the setting or denial of bail, any memorandum in response shall be filed within

twenty days after the memorandum in support of jurisdiction is filed.

(3) If more than one memorandum in support of jurisdiction is timely filed, the time

period for filing any memorandum in response specified in this rule commences the day

the last memorandum in support of jurisdiction was timely filed.

(B) Page limitation and contents of memorandum

(1) Except in postconviction death-penalty cases, a memorandum in response to a

memorandum in support of jurisdiction shall not exceed fifteen numbered pages, exclusive

of the table of contents, the signature block, and the certificate of service; shall not include

any attachments; and shall contain both of the following:

(a) A statement of the appellee’s position as to whether a substantial

constitutional question is involved, whether leave to appeal in a felony case should

be granted, or whether the case is of public or great general interest;

(b) A brief and concise argument in support of the appellee’s position regarding

each proposition of law raised in the memorandum in support of jurisdiction. An

appellee shall not submit additional or contrary propositions of law, but shall only

respond to the propositions of law contained in the appellant’s memorandum in

support of jurisdiction.

(2) In a postconviction death-penalty case, there is no page limit, and there is no

requirement as to contents for a memorandum in response to a memorandum in support of

jurisdiction.

(C) Multiple memoranda and time for response

If two or more memoranda in support of jurisdiction are filed in a case, the appellee shall

file only one memorandum in response. The time specified in division (A) of this rule for

filing the memorandum in response shall be calculated from the date the last memorandum

in support of jurisdiction was filed in the case.

History

Effective Date: June 1, 1994 Amended: April 1, 1996; April 1, 2000; April 1, 2002; July 1, 2004; January 1, 2008; January 1, 2010; January 1, 2013; January 1, 2015; April 1, 2025

Provenance

Source
supremecourt.ohio.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-14
Edition
2026-09-14
Content hash
3e5fed6069cc1626afb4bda53f1bf8798d608ccb7ea902692dcd0f3e3624ce2b
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.