OH · rules
Ohio Evid.R. 901
Requirement of Authentication or Identification
(A) General provision
The requirement of authentication or identification as a condition precedent to admissibility
is satisfied by evidence sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what
its proponent claims.
(B) Illustrations
By way of illustration only, and not by way of limitation, the following are examples of
authentication or identification conforming with the requirements of this rule:
(1) Testimony of witness with knowledge
Testimony that a matter is what it is claimed to be.
(2) Nonexpert opinion on handwriting
Nonexpert opinion as to the genuineness of handwriting, based upon
familiarity not acquired for purposes of the litigation.
(3) Comparison by trier or expert witness
Comparison by the trier of fact or by expert witness with specimens which
have been authenticated.
(4) Distinctive characteristics and the like
Appearance, contents, substance, internal patterns, or other distinctive
characteristics, taken in conjunction with circumstances.
(5) Voice identification
Identification of a voice, whether heard firsthand or through mechanical or
electronic transmission or recording, by opinion based upon hearing the
voice at any time under circumstances connecting it with the alleged
speaker.
(6) Telephone conversations
Telephone conversations, by evidence that a call was made to the number
assigned at the time by the telephone company to a particular person or
business, if (a) in the case of a person, circumstances, including self -
identification, show the person answering to be the one called, or (b) in the
case of a business, the call was made to a place of business and the
conversation related to business reasonably transacted over the telephone.
(7) Public records or reports
Evidence that a writing authorized by law to be recorded or filed and in fact
recorded or filed in a public office, or a purported public record, report,
statement or data compilation, in any form, is from the public office where
items of this nature are kept.
(8) Ancient documents or data compilation
Evidence that a document or data compilation, in any form, (a) is in such
condition as to create no suspicion concerning its authenticity, (b) was in a
place where it, if authentic, would likely be, and (c) has been in existence
twenty years or more at the time it is offered.
(9) Process or system
Evidence describing a process or system used to produce a result and
showing that the process or system produces an accurate result.
(10) Methods provided by statute or rule
Any method of authentication or identification provided by statute enacted
by the General Assembly not in conflict with a rule of the Supreme Court
of Ohio or by other rules prescribed by the Supreme Court.
History
Effective Date: July 1, 1980
Provenance
- Source
- supremecourt.ohio.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-14
- Edition
- 2026-09-14
- Content hash
53727ee9b192beb6d3d925dab7ca191ca5f8a3cbd5a61c8903eaf5dc9bf63e65
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.