Bindinglaw

OH · rules

Ohio Evid.R. 607

Impeachment

activein force · 2023-07-01 – presentact-effective-date

(A) Who may impeach

The credibility of a witness may be attacked by any party except that the credibility of a

witness may be attacked by the party calling the witness by means of a prior inconsistent

statement only upon a showing of surprise and affirmative damage. This exc eption does

not apply to statements admitted pursuant to Evid.R. 801(D)(1)(a), 801(D)(2), or 803.

(B) Impeachment: reasonable basis

A questioner must have a reasonable basis for asking any question pertaining to impeachment

that implies the existence of an impeaching fact.

History

Effective Date: July 1, 1980 Amended: July 1, 1998; July 1, 2023 Staff Note (July 1, 1998 Amendment) Rule 607 Impeachment Rule 607(A) Who may impeach. This paragraph was labeled division (A), a title was added, and the style used for rule references was changed. There was no substantive amendment to this division. Rule 607(B) Impeachment: reasonable basis. The 1998 amendment added division (B) to the rule. A party inquiring into specific instances of conduct must have a good faith basis in fact for asking the question. E.g., State v. Gillard (1988), 40 Ohio St.3d 226, 231, 533 N.E.2d 272 ("[A] cross-examiner may ask a question if the examiner has a good-faith belief that a factual predicate for the question exists."), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 925, 109 S.Ct. 3263, 106 L.Ed.2d 608 (1989); Kornreich v. Indus. Fire Ins. Co. (1936), 132 Ohio St. 78, 88 ("These collateral attacks must be made in good faith. . . ."). This is especially true in criminal cases where the unfair prejudice may be great. See also 1 McCormick, Evidence § 41, at 140 (4th ed. 1992) ("A good faith basis for the inquiry is required."). Professor Graham explains the requirement as follows: Note that the requirement of a good faith basis applies only when the cross-examiner is effectively asserting in the form of a question the truth of a factual statement included within the question. If the cross-examiner is merely inquiring whether something is or is not true, a good faith basis is not required. Thus the question, "Your glasses were being repaired at the time of the accident, weren't they?" requires a good faith basis, while the question, "Were you wearing your glasses at the time of the accident?" does not. 1 Graham, Handbook of Federal Evidence § 607.2, at 679-80 (4th ed. 1996). Using the term "reasonable basis," the amendment codifies the good-faith basis-in-fact requirement as recognized at common law. In addition to the Rules of Evidence, the Code of Professional Responsibility imposes requirements on questioning witnesses. See DR 7-106(C).

Provenance

Source
supremecourt.ohio.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-14
Edition
2026-09-14
Content hash
1ee0203127386a552d8a1dcb5828dad29e5da78df018f5e9ef3a2cf23c355fc7
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Ohio Evid.R. 607 — Impeachment · binding.law