OH · rules
Ohio Crim.R. 41
Search and Seizure
(A) Authority to issue warrant
Upon the request of a prosecuting attorney or a law enforcement officer:
(1) A search warrant authorized by this rule may be issued by a judge of a court
of record to search and seize property located within the court's territorial
jurisdiction; and,
(2) A tracking device warrant authorized by this rule may be issued by a judge
of a court of record to install a tracking device within the court’s territorial
jurisdiction. The warrant may authorize use of the device to track the
movement of a person or property within or outside of the court’s territorial
jurisdiction, or both.
(B) Property which may be seized with a search warrant
A search warrant may be issued under this rule to search for and seize any:
(1) evidence of the commission of a criminal offense; or
(2) contraband, the fruits of crime, or things otherwise criminally possessed; or
(3) weapons or other things by means of which a crime has been committed or
reasonably appears about to be committed.
(C) Issuance and contents
(1) A warrant shall issue on either an affidavit or affidavits sworn to before a judge of
a court of record or an affidavit or affidavits communicated to the judge by reliable
electronic means establishing the grounds for issuing the warrant. In the case of a
search warrant, the aff idavit shall name or describe the person to be searched or
particularly describe the place to be searched, name or describe the property to be
searched for and seized, state substantially the offense in relation thereto, and state
the factual basis for the affiant's belief that such property is there located. In the
case of a tracking device warrant, the affidavit shall name or describe the person to
be tracked or particularly describe the property to be tracked, and state substantially
the offense in relation thereto, state the factual basis for the affiant’s belief that the
tracking will yield evidence of the offense. If the affidavit is provided by reliable
electronic means, the applicant communicating the affidavit shall be placed under
oath and shall swear to or affirm the affidavit communicated.
(2) If the judge is satisfied that probable cause exists, the judge shall issue a warrant
identifying the property to be seized and naming or describing the person or place
to be searched or the person or property to be tracked. The warrant may be issued
to the requesting prosecuting attorney or other law enforcement officer through
reliable electronic means. The finding of probable cause may be based upon
hearsay in whole or in part, provided there is a substantial basis for believing the
source of the hearsay to be credible and for believing that there is a factual basis for
the information furnished. Before ruling on a request for a warrant, the judge may
require the affiant to appear personally or by reliable electronic means, and may
examine under oath the affiant and any witnesses the affiant may produce. Such
testimony shall be admissible at a hearing on a motion to suppress if taken down
by a court reporter or recording equipment, transcribed, and made part of the
affidavit. The warrant shall be directed to a law enforcement officer. A search
warrant shall command the officer to search, within three days, the person or place
named for the property specified. A tracking device warrant shall command the
officer to complete any installation authorized by the warrant within a specified
time no longer than 10 days, and shall specify the time that the device may be used,
not to exceed 45 days. The court may, for good cause shown, grant one or more
extensions of time that the device may be used, for a reasonable period not to exceed
45 days each. The warrant shall be executed in the daytime, unless the issuing
court, by appropriate provision in the warrant, and for reasonable cause shown,
authorizes its execution at times other than daytime. The warrant shall provide that
the warrant shall be returned to a designated judge or clerk of court.
(D) Execution and return of the warrant
(1) Search warrant
The officer taking property under the warrant shall give to the person from whom
or from whose premises the property was taken a copy of the warrant and a receipt
for the property taken, or shall leave the copy and receipt at the place from which
the property was taken. The return shall be made promptly, either in person or by
reliable electronic means, and shall be accompanied by a written inventory of any
property taken. The inventory shall be made in the presence of the applicant for
the warrant and the person from whose possession or premises the property was
taken, if they are present, or in the pr esence of at least one credible person other
than the applicant for the warrant or the person from whose possession or premises
the property was taken, and shall be verified by the officer. The judge shall upon
request deliver a copy of the inventory to t he person from whom or from whose
premises the property was taken and to the applicant for the warrant. Property
seized under a warrant shall be kept for use as evidence by the court which issued
the warrant or by the law enforcement agency which executed the warrant.
(2) Tracking Device warrant
The officer executing a tracking device warrant shall enter onto the warrant the
exact date and time the device was installed and the period during which it was
used. The return shall be made promptly, either in person or by reliable electronic
means, after the use of the tracking device has ended. Within 10 days after the use
of the tracking device has ended, the officer executing a tracking device warrant
must serve a copy of the warrant on the person who was tracked or whose property
was tracked. Service may be accomplished by delivering a copy to the person who,
or whose property, was tracked; or by leaving a copy at the person’s residence or
usual place of abode with an individual of suitable age and discretion who resides
at that location and by mailing a copy to the person’s last known address. Upon
the request of a prosecuting attorney or a law enforcement officer, and for good
cause shown, the court may authorize notice to be delayed for a reasonable period.
(E) Return of papers to clerk
The law enforcement officer shall attach to the warrant a copy of the return, inventory, and
all other papers in connection therewith and shall file them with the clerk or the judge, if
the warrant so requires.
(F) Definition of property and daytime
The term "property" is used in this rule to include documents, books, papers and any other
tangible objects. The term "daytime" is used in this rule to mean the hours from 7:00 a.m.
to 8:00 p.m.
(G) Definition of tracking device
The term “tracking device” means an electronic or mechanical device which permits the
tracking of the movement of a person or object.
History
Effective Date: July 1, 1973 Amended: July 1, 2010; July 1, 2014; July 1, 2021 Staff Note (July 1, 2010 Amendment) The revisions to Crim.R. 41 now permit an applicant for a search warrant to be in communication with a judge by reliable electronic means. The concept of reliable electronic means is seen as broad enough to encompass present communication technologies as well as those that may be developed over the next decades. Nothing in these revisions is intended to lessen the requirement that the judge confirm the identity of the applying law enforcement officer, that the judge is satisfied that probable cause for a warrant exists, and that an appropriate record for subsequent review is created.
Provenance
- Source
- supremecourt.ohio.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-14
- Edition
- 2026-09-14
- Content hash
5a2155fc12fd11db583ef16e2cb70334bd2939f2d656da91d7785ede515191a2
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.