NY · rules
22 NYCRR 604.3
Conduct of criminal trial threatened by disruptive conduct
(a) Removal of disruptive defendant.
(1) If a defendant engages in disruptive conduct by word or action in the courtroom in the course of his trial, the trial judge may order the defendant to be removed from the courtroom and placed in custody, and the trial judge may proceed with the trial in the absence of the defendant.
(2) The trial judge may not exclude the defendant except after warning that further disruptive conduct will lead to removal of the defendant from the courtroom.
(3) The defendant shall be returned to the courtroom immediately upon a determination by the court that the defendant is not likely to engage in further disruptive conduct.
(b) Communication between defendant and courtroom. If the defendant is removed from the courtroom under the provisions of paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of this section, the trial judge shall make reasonable efforts to establish methods of communication linking the defendant with the courtroom while his trial is in progress. For such defendant the judge may provide methods of communication in any way suitable to the physical facilities of the courthouse and consonant with the goal of providing adequate communication to the courtroom and to defense counsel.
(c) Restraint of defendant.
(1) If a defendant engages in disruptive conduct in the course of the trial, and the trial judge determines not to take action under subdivision (a) of this section, the trial judge may order the defendant to be physically restrained in the courtroom while his trial continues.
(2) The trial judge shall not apply the restraints authorized in the preceding subdivision unless he has warned the defendant, following disruptive conduct by the defendant, that further misconduct will lead to the physical restraint of the defendant in the courtroom.
(3) The physical restraint of the defendant shall be terminated immediately upon a determination by the court that the defendant is not likely to engage in further disruptive conduct.
Provenance
- Source
- law.cornell.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-17
- Edition
- 2026-09-17
- Content hash
e3c8f6728da503f3130de6a33d70c1b66820ae853a1eea6807763a8507f1d247
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.