Bindinglaw

NY · rules

22 NYCRR 29.2

Appellate courts

activein force · 2016-06-21 – presentact-effective-date

In respect to appellate courts, the Chief Judge hereby authorizes electronic photographic recording of proceedings in such courts, subject to the approval of the respective appellate court.

(a) Conferences of counsel. To protect the attorney-client privilege and effective right to counsel, there shall be no audio pickup or audio broadcast of conferences which occur in a court facility between attorneys and their clients, between co-counsel of a client, or between counsel and the presiding judge held at the bench, without the express consent of all participants in the conference. Nor shall any chambers conference be filmed, recorded or broadcast.

(b) Consent not required. Electronic media or print photography coverage of appellate arguments shall not be limited by the objection of counsel or parties, except for good cause shown.

(c) Appellate review. An order granting or denying the electronic media from access to any proceeding, or affecting other matters arising under these rules and standards, shall not be appealable insofar as it pertains to and arises under these rules and standards except as otherwise provided and authorized by law.

History

2016: 29 > Repealed sections 29.2 (a), (b), (c), (d), (e) & section 29.4 on Jun. 21 (order: https://www.nycourts.gov/LegacyPDFS/rules/chiefjudge/AO-02-16 - Chief Judge.pdf)

Provenance

Source
nycourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-17
Edition
2026-09-16
Content hash
97cf7b673d9a9b2c41a2196ac4c0a8e6be91af97af4e6b059ed52112224ab639
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
22 NYCRR 29.2 — Appellate courts · binding.law