Bindinglaw

NY · rules

22 NYCRR 205.20

Designation of a facility for the questioning of children in custody (juvenile delinquency)

activein force · 2026-09-16 – presentact-effective-date

(a) The district administrative judge in each judicial district outside the City of New York and the administrative judge for the Family Court within the City of New York, or a designee, shall arrange for the inspection of any facility within the judicial district proposed for designation as suitable for the questioning of children pursuant to section 305.2 of the Family Court Act, and if found suitable, the district administrative judge or the administrative judge for the Family Court within the City of New York, as appropriate, shall recommend its designation to the Chief Administrator of the Courts.

(b) Every recommendation to the Chief Administrator of the Courts shall include:

(1) the room number or identification, the type of facility in which the room is located, the address and the hours of access;

(2) the name of the police or other law enforcement agency, department of probation, Family Court judge or other interested person or agency which proposed the designation of the particular facility;

(3) a signed and dated copy of the report of inspection of the proposed facility, made at the direction of the district administrative judge or the administrative judge for the Family Court within the City of New York; and

(4) the factors upon which the recommendation is based.

(c) Any facility recommended for designation as suitable for the questioning of children shall be separate from areas accessible to the general public and adult detainees.

(d) Insofar as possible, the district administrative judge or the administrative judge for the Family Court within the City of New York, in making a recommendation for designation, shall seek to assure an adequate number and reasonable geographic distribution of designated questioning facilities, and that:

(1) the room is located in a police facility or in a governmental facility not regularly or exclusively used for the education or care of children;

(2) the room presents an office-like, rather than a jail-like, setting;

(3) the room is clean and well maintained;

(4) the room is well lit and heated;

(5) there are separate toilet facilities for children or, in the alternative, procedures insuring the privacy and safety of the children when in use;

(6) there is a separate entrance for children or, in the alternative, there are procedures which minimize public exposure and avoid mingling with the adult detainees;

(7) a person will be in attendance with the child whenever the room is in use as a questioning facility, such person to be a policewoman or other qualified female person when the child is a female; and

(8) any other factors relevant to suitability for designation are considered.

(e) The appropriate district administrative judge or the administrative judge for the Family Court within the City of New York, or a designee, when notified of any material physical change in a facility designated for the questioning of children, shall arrange for the reinspection of such facility concerning its continued suitability for designation.

(f) A current list of facilities designated for the questioning of children within each judicial district and within the City of New York shall be maintained by the district administrative judge and the administrative judge for the Family Court within the City of New York, and shall be kept for easy public inspection in each Family Court in that judicial district and within the City of New York. A current statewide list shall be maintained in the office of the Chief Administrator of the Courts. These lists shall be kept available for public inspection.

Provenance

Source
nycourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-17
Edition
2026-09-16
Content hash
a19a3de1d112c29be5273f5cfa5b3138a56305dc9870aec6bb8d6fab4091e0e4
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.